It was very noticeable even with my low stall (2100ish) PI stall. Its hardly noticeable at all with the stock stall.

 

Thanks for now Im going to do the segment swap but will def do this when I decide to stall her.

 

Finally got my truck running after the 80e swap. Did this mod and works great Have all 4 gears with the 60e tune.

 

Care to do a write up?

 

Lol!!!

 

So I realize this thread is controversial and a bit irrelevant since the useful data isnt there...but to my point

There were two sets of directions; one with PWM and one without. What are the effects, specifically of torque converter behavior of using the non-pwm wiring setup with only a single relay versus using the two relay pwm method? Should lockup basically be on/off and operate normally using the single relay, or are both needed for full torque converter lockup?

 

It still fully locks up with only 1 relay. Its only a matter of on/off lockup vs slowly locking up (PWM).

 

Unless there is a patent registered over the wiring schematics then this topic can be public knowledge. Also for the member who charging $20 for the knowledge, he is basically violating site sponsor policy because i dont see him on the site sponsor list.

 

I always disable TCC PWM in the tune anyway... No sense in letting those clutches drag IMO, especially with the torque some of our trucks make.

 

No he is not.
He is a contract engineer for my company. I am a sponsor on the sister site. It is his intellectual knowledge that he took the time to develop for his own use. He also took the time to write up instructions for my customers. Rather than have my shop charge for the info and then have to defer any technical support to him I told him to charge directly on his end.

Edit: Confused two different usernames.

Another note:
I could easily distribute the information from my company and charge more for it and then pay his royalties. It costs the end user less if I don't have to charge for it, pay credit card fees, taxes, and overhead.