GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

anyone try on a new furd 6.2 or 3.5 TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 05:48 PM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

Had a chance to personally drive and run an EcoBoost a couple weeks back. It is an impressive setup, but no match for a tuned 6.2 Chevy, especially from a dig. By 70, I had several lengths on the Ford. Didn't get a video, since there weren't any passengers in either truck.

The biggest thing I observed about the EcoBoost, was that the mileage wasn't any better than I see from a 5.3 or 6.2 chevy. It was getting about 18 mpg at 70mph, with the cruise on.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 10:10 PM
  #52  
Onetogofast's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, TX
Default

Originally Posted by BrutalSierra
Very true! But look at all the problems we have with the shitty DOD?AFM!

I loathe ford just as much as the next guy, but a direct injected TT v6 in a 1/2ton... That's pretty amazing and i cant wait to see GM's answer to it.

If i was a ford guy WHICH I'M NOT i'd be all over the Eco-boost! i seen with a tune and down pipe you gain 90hp! 2011 Ford EcoBoost F-150 picks up 90rwhp with Fastlane's tuning - YouTube

In the end it's still a v6 and sounds like ****, but turbos spooling can fix that!

I have also found this illustration showing fords engine torque curve
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/...que_Curves.jpg

I believe these will be our biggest threat once the aftermarket catches up.

like the old saying goes.. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer!
Was this dyno run in 2nd gear?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 12:00 PM
  #53  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

Here is the type of testing ive been waiting to find

6.2 vs ecoboost stock for stock apple to apples


Reply
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 11:15 PM
  #54  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

On the second vid I wish the eco guy would have boosted up,but the top end speaks for itself.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 11:35 PM
  #55  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

Yea that would have been completely different if the guy had known how to drive. My roommate has has a excab 4x4 eco all stock with 3.73 gears and it would have murdered both of those trucks with a boosted 4x4 launch. Thing runs about like my mid 13 sec duramax.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #56  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

hearing it from you it worries me but what about the top end pull in this video?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 06:16 AM
  #57  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

The top end looked similar in the dig race up to 14~15 seconds. I think on avg a decent running 6.2 will prob come out on top with both trucks being 2wd. The eco in a 4x4 with a good driver and 3.73 gear could be hard to beat due to the boosted launch with traction. Some of the eco's have really high gears like a 3.15. From a roll the 6.2 GM should have no worries.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 06:22 AM
  #58  
Ieatpeople's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: westminster, md
Default

i have been reading alot of ford forums, and checking inventory and pricing. i have come to a conclusion: I'm trading my chevy for a ford.

to be more specific, a 2013 f150 5.0 scsb 2wd, w/3.55 rear.

heres why:

my payment will go down, my insurance will go down, it gets better gas mileage, and its WAY faster than my truck. i dont need 4wd or a longbed anymore, so this is the way to go for me.

with just a tune the truck will run 14.0, and an intake and exhaust, running 13.5. Thats way easier than doing intake, cam, headers, exhaust, stall, and tune in my truck.


however, this winter is supposed to be very cold and wet, so i'm keeping the 4wd until spring.

Last edited by Ieatpeople; Aug 23, 2012 at 06:30 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 05:24 PM
  #59  
rice eater 03's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Default

houston we have a problem..lol having a 6.2 awd with a tune, intake, headers and exaust i wasnt really to worried about any of the fords... but i have to admit now im sweating alil err alot
my truck runs 13.9s at 100mph @ 5680lbs

strait from livernos
Earlier tonight a customer of ours was at the track with his EB F150 Supercrew 4WD, 3.55. It's Bone Stock other than our 93 tune and ran 13.67 @ 97.45 at 5400lbs

and here is way that damn lil ford ran a 60'...1.859 !!!!

how the hell im i gonna get that kinda 60s to even make it a race..lol
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #60  
chriscon7's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

I feel like the only way GM could take the market back from the ecoboost is if they went through with the baby Dmax in a half ton. Other than that, GM coming out with Direct Injection and 8 speed autos ain't gonna cut it
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.