INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Head Question for a Gen I SBC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
axisT6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 11
From: League City, Texas
Default Head Question for a Gen I SBC

I am building a 406 SBC for MAX TORQUE. I know that a small cam with good flowing heads = big torque. My question is, what heads?

So far I have been looking at AFR 210 cc heads, but I wonder if there is something that flows just as well for a lesser price.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #2  
Grumpy5.3's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: South Georgia
Default

I have pro action heads on my 406, theyhave different runner sizes, i got 230cc runners with 2.08 valves, but i know you can get them smaller. mine were under a grand ready to go, except for drilling the steam holes...
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #3  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

Edelbrock makes a Performer RPM head that runs just under a thousand dollars a pair. For about $300 bucks more your could buy their Victor Jr heads. Of course you'll want to figure out what size chambers you'll need. They have a couple of popular chamber sizes that should fit your combination. The Performer RPM part number is 60719 (70cc angle plug). The Victor Jr. part number is 77619 and has the same 70cc chamber and angle plugs.

Good luck,

Richard
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #4  
axisT6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 11
From: League City, Texas
Default

Thanks for your help guys. I should have mentioned that I plan to run the HOLLEY 4 Barrel TBI system.

Does this give me a little more flexibility in selecting an intake runner size since the motor doesn't have to rely as much on engine vacuum to pull fuel into the cylinders?

Thanks.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

I'm not familiar with the Holley TBI system. If the injectiors are located at the ttb, then the system is still a wet flow system and runner size will have some influence on port average air speed. If the injectors are located at the head flange then your dealing with a dry system and there is less sensitivity and more flexability in runner size.

Richard
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
YenkoST's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default

If you want low end torque....go smaller intake runners. Such as AFR 180cc or 195cc. Or you can go with a Vortec casting with a little porting and have a ton of low end/mid range torque. With each, you will have to drill for the steam hole if you are using a 400 block. TBI engines have great low end torque already but just don't go to radical. How are you planning on controlling the electronics part of it...GM harness/computer or C950?
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
axisT6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 11
From: League City, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by YenkoST
If you want low end torque....go smaller intake runners. Such as AFR 180cc or 195cc. Or you can go with a Vortec casting with a little porting and have a ton of low end/mid range torque. With each, you will have to drill for the steam hole if you are using a 400 block. TBI engines have great low end torque already but just don't go to radical. How are you planning on controlling the electronics part of it...GM harness/computer or C950?
I plan to use HOLLEY's complete kit. It will include the C950 PRO ECM along w/WB02. Good call on the runners. I was looking at heads with 200cc runners with 2.02/1.60 valves which looked really promising for what I am trying to accomplish. I won't have to worry about drilling the steam holes as they are plugged on the block. The cooling system I have planned for this motor will suffice quite well.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #8  
axisT6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 11
From: League City, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
I'm not familiar with the Holley TBI system. If the injectiors are located at the ttb, then the system is still a wet flow system and runner size will have some influence on port average air speed. If the injectors are located at the head flange then your dealing with a dry system and there is less sensitivity and more flexability in runner size.

Richard
Thanks for that info. If this truck was going to stay on the street, then I would use an MPFI system, but since this thing will be off in the woods as well, I prefer the reliability and cost effectiveness of TBI.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:56 AM
  #9  
YenkoST's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 4
From: GA
Default

200cc is a much better choice......I still perfer a 195cc max runner for a MAX low end torque engine esp. on a TBI engine. Your main powerband will be from idle to 5000 rpms with a TBI unit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
Aug 29, 2016 12:48 AM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Aug 9, 2015 04:34 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
vmaxpro
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 27, 2015 10:45 PM
bsn1989
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
0
Jul 16, 2015 08:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.