THE TRUCK STOP General Chat area. Religion and politics topics will undoubtedly be deleted. Anything over PG-13 is not allowed. WORK SAFE!

ecoboost f150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
06Sierra2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: el paso, tx
Default ecoboost f150

so whos seen it and what is it gonna take to be faster? im not too worried, i think i a 5.3 with h/c/i will handle it. there rated at like 420lbs of torque but the 1/4 test i seen had a ecsb run like 14.6 at sea level. what are everyones opinions? hows gm gonna respond to this? mods feel free to move this wherever necessary
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:42 PM
  #2  
charcoal03silvy's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 1
From: South OKC/ Moore, OKlahoma
Default

Originally Posted by 06Sierra2
so whos seen it and what is it gonna take to be faster? im not too worried, i think i a 5.3 with h/c/i will handle it. there rated at like 420lbs of torque but the 1/4 test i seen had a ecsb run like 14.6 at sea level. what are everyones opinions? hows gm gonna respond to this? mods feel free to move this wherever necessary
With a good tune and some meth I bet they'll run pretty damn good.

Buuuuut I'm sure a mild 5.3 could stay on par with it.

Kinda sad if you think about how GM is using engine technology almost 20 years old and is still out performing brand new technology
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:47 PM
  #3  
06Sierra2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: el paso, tx
Default

Originally Posted by charcoal03silvy
Kinda sad if you think about how GM is using engine technology almost 20 years old and is still out performing brand new technology
i know right. dont fix what isnt broke
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:54 PM
  #4  
RibeiroBJJ's Avatar
Praise The Lowered
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 2
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by charcoal03silvy
With a good tune and some meth I bet they'll run pretty damn good.

Buuuuut I'm sure a mild 5.3 could stay on par with it.

Kinda sad if you think about how GM is using engine technology almost 57 years old and is still out performing brand new technology
*FIXED*

The first pushrod Chevrolet small block was introduced in 1954 IIRC...On a side note the industry mocked GM in the 90's when they were developing the Gen3 Motor...LOL

What is the ecoboost ? ...I dont keep up with Ford
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
silverado2000's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 568
Likes: 2
From: austin,texas
Default

its a twin turbo v6 that makes 365hp and 420lbs and runs around a 14.6 stock. in a ext cab.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #6  
chevyboy.520's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 934
Likes: 7
Default

It's one of 4 new engines ford will be using in the half ton line up. A new V6, a 5.0 similar to the one in new stands, I believe some changes to it for more torque, such as diff cams, and exhaust manifolds. I could be wrong on the differences. They have the Eco boosted engine. And then there new 6.2, I have a feeling that these new engines from ford will run strong, but not strong enough! We will see
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
262_NBS's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by charcoal03silvy
With a good tune and some meth I bet they'll run pretty damn good.

Buuuuut I'm sure a mild 5.3 could stay on par with it.

Kinda sad if you think about how GM is using engine technology almost 20 years old and is still out performing brand new technology
pretty sure that a stock untuned ecoboost V6 will spank to a mild 5.3 if not a 6.0 SS . Too bad you can't get one in a RCSB configuration.

Put an Ecoboost in a mustang and i'll be heading over to the ford dealership ....hello SVO
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 01:37 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Katy & College Station, TX
Default

ummm how bout a 6.2? they seem to run 14's even in C/C form
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 02:34 AM
  #9  
kciSS05's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: b.h,MI
Default

Originally Posted by 262_NBS
pretty sure that a stock untuned ecoboost V6 will spank to a mild 5.3 if not a 6.0 SS . Too bad you can't get one in a RCSB configuration.

Put an Ecoboost in a mustang and i'll be heading over to the ford dealership ....hello SVO
Hahaaha idk about the 6.0 part. And its sad ford always has to boost their motors to keep up with gm's na motors! Hahaha oh well that's why they will always be second! As for this ecoboost. Kind of a bad idea if you think about it. A small motor with turbos trucks are about torque if you use them for a truck. Small motor with a turbo naw I will pass for a dmax if that's the case! Hahaha
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 05:08 AM
  #10  
KleenHall's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Default

the fords are heavy pigs

i think a 6.2 hybrid may be comparable,lol power and mpg
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.