INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3L's year to year diffrences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #1  
TG02Z71's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default 5.3L's year to year diffrences?

I have two 5.3l engines, one bought from someone here and the one in my truck. One is from a 1999 or a 2000, mine is a 2002.
Going to get the machining underway soon and am wondering which is better for my build into a 5.7l?
Any ideas or suggestions??

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
mcfarlnd's Avatar
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 10
From: DFW
Default

both are the same. heads might be a different casting but, the 2000 will be good to bolt your 2002 parts to or vice versa
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

the 06 5.3 block I got was exactly the same except for the fuel system. Same heads, same intake (besides DBW), same water pump, everything. The only thing I had to change was the temp sensor on top of the block
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #4  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

flip a coin
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #5  
InchUp's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
flip a coin
If it comes down to it, yes, I'd flip a coin since the differences are subtle that have nothing to do with the machining.

I would keep the running 5.3L in your truck and build the 5.7L on the side to lessen the down time of the truck.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #6  
lady3bglover's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
From: Alvin, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by InchUp
If it comes down to it, yes, I'd flip a coin since the differences are subtle that have nothing to do with the machining.

I would keep the running 5.3L in your truck and build the 5.7L on the side to lessen the down time of the truck.

He's got a point, lessen the amount of down time...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #7  
TouchOfEvil04's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Walker
Default

i thought they upgraded the rods?
or was that just the 6.0l motors?...i forget..
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #8  
TG02Z71's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I thought the early cranks were cast VS forged? These are the deatils I'm looking for.
New rods will be used so thats not a big deal and I also have a set of 317s off an SS truck.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
InchUp's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TG02Z71
I thought the early cranks were cast VS forged? These are the deatils I'm looking for.
New rods will be used so thats not a big deal and I also have a set of 317s off an SS truck.
That'll work for sure. Mill the 317's down to match the right head gasket and compression ratio you're after. Anywhere in the range of 9.8-10.3:1 you'll still be alright on cheap gas.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 05:56 AM
  #10  
TG02Z71's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I was thinking close to stock compression ratio would be best since I will stay with a turbo set up for added power.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.