Thoughts or Opinions on this cam (lq9)
#11
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 372
From: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
That cam has similar specs to my Comp LSR 265 grind though the Lunati has a little more lift.
I have LT's, HF cats, CircleD 3200 and 4.11's and love the way it pulls of the line.
It pulls very good up top as well.
I have LT's, HF cats, CircleD 3200 and 4.11's and love the way it pulls of the line.
It pulls very good up top as well.
#13
#15
i was assuming before can with what you have now.
heres some one with a similar truck as yours on the dyno. and he added a tsp220 cam.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-graph-519133/
heres some one with a similar truck as yours on the dyno. and he added a tsp220 cam.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-graph-519133/
#16
Those are impressive numbers, my truck has the factory dual 2.75" exhaust..wonder how much difference there would be between that and his 3.5" single?? I wouldnt think too much..which cam would you pick for my application? The lunati 217/223 or the tsp 220??
#17
for me i like being a little different and would go voodoo as a lot of people use the tsp220.
yes i would think i would up the exhaust to 3.5" all the way back also.
yes i would think i would up the exhaust to 3.5" all the way back also.
Last edited by bobfig; Jan 29, 2015 at 09:41 AM.
#20
Ok, yeah i like the way it sounds now, but i was unsure which setup would perform better after the cam converter etc..i assume the 3" duals would but would they be worth switching from what i have now (2.75")
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM



