Lets play...Name that broken part
#231
Originally Posted by 1SlowHoe
Do they mean EVERYTHING from the intake to the oil pan? I would have a lot of left over parts from the 5.3 huh?
http://www.gmgoodwrench.com/PartsAcc...chEngines.html
#235
Thread Starter
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,962
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
This is where the disagreements start. I don't understand the compression thing but it seems as if the compression is already a little higher (LQ9) I would have to force less air in to it to get the same boost levels. Less work for the blower, same boost. Right/Wrong?
#237
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
Originally Posted by 1SlowHoe
This is where the disagreements start. I don't understand the compression thing but it seems as if the compression is already a little higher (LQ9) I would have to force less air in to it to get the same boost levels. Less work for the blower, same boost. Right/Wrong?
#238
Originally Posted by Naked AV
If you were talking turbo or 3.3L twin screw I'd say you are certainly correct. But a Radix is close to its maximum efficiency right about the time that you're at the boost limit for the LQ9.
That is correct, which is why the stock pulley for an LQ9 is 3.3", while the stock pulley for the LQ4 is 3.1". You need more pulley on an LQ4 to make the same boost.
That is correct, which is why the stock pulley for an LQ9 is 3.3", while the stock pulley for the LQ4 is 3.1". You need more pulley on an LQ4 to make the same boost.
actually that is incorrect, number one it is not close to the limit on a 360 ci motor....but this is an age old argument that is sure to continue for years to come!
Second, the stock pulley for the LQ9 is a 3.3, this is correct. This is due to the fact that the higher compression ratio vs pump gas does not work very well on the street.....a LQ4 and an LQ9 are both 360 or so CI, so the reason behind the different pulley size is fuel limits, not needing a smaller pulley to make the same boost...That being said, the LQ4 makes about 6-6.5 psi and the LQ9 is about 5-5.5 psi.....
#239
i wonder what squashed it. im voting piston.
definately sounds like mine before it siezed
http://www.savefile.com/files/2945468
definately sounds like mine before it siezed
http://www.savefile.com/files/2945468
#240
a friend of mine bounced a lifter off of the cam hard enough to gouge the wheel and cam in his '01 5.3 Z71. instead of rebuilding the old we went with the gm crate LQ9 crate. it came just as below minus engine covers, ac, alternator and belt. even came filled with mobile 1 5w-30. had to swap TBs since this came with an ETC version, along with his return-style fuel rail and regulator. runs great. he has 36" swampers and 4.56s with detroit lockers and can boil them down from a dig.







