GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

5.3L s-10 Swap Dyno's 448RWHP 456RWTQ

Old Aug 24, 2006 | 10:50 AM
  #1  
Black X's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!
Default 5.3L s-10 Swap Dyno's 448RWHP 456RWTQ

Took the truck to the dyno today.


Click here to see Video
Naturally Aspirated #'s
325RWHP 327RWTQ


Click here to see Video
Nitrous 150 Jets #'s
449RWHP 456RWTQ

Truck was spinning pretty bad. You can see in the video out the back of the shop everything disappears....

Was hoping for a little more on the bottle. The N/A numbers are awesome, I could not be happier.

MODS:
2001 5.3L engine, BBK SSI Intake Manifold and 80MM throttle body,Comp cams 216/220 .525/.532 114LSA, Comp Cams 918's, Comp Cams Hardened push tubes, Custom 3.5" cold air intake, Sanderson 1-5/8" primary ceramic coated short tube headers,Custom 2.5" Y-pipe into single 3.5" through dynomax bullet and flowmaster 40 series, MSD wires, NGK TR6 plugs, ASP Underdrive pullies, ARP Rod Bolts, Electric fans, B&M Hammer Shifter, YANK SS3600 Stall converter, Trans-go HD-2 Shift kit, Corvette Servo, 3.73's, Zexel Torsen Differential,TA Performance Girdle, Competition engineering Slide-A-Links, Mickey Thompson 255/50/16 Drag radials.

1/4 Mile times so far

N/A 12.94@107.51 MPH 1.85 60'
Progressive 125Shot: 11.56@121 MPH 1.65 60'

Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
912jonathon's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Lumber City, GA
Default

great #'s there. how hard was it to put the 5.3 in the s-10??
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
JAXOps's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta - Kennesaw
Default

Nice numbers. Definetly sounds mean,
Would like to see some more videos of it idling and drive by's if possible.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
SBTork's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaCrosse, WI
Default

freaking sweet, great work man
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #5  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Why such a small cam for a larger stall. I would think you could utilize atleast a 228 duration cam with your light weight and big stall speed. Never the less nice numbers man. One of the things that you can attribute to the low spray numbers is the relative low lift of your cam, I have noticed that on a few low lift cam dynos when the engine was sprayed. Are you experiecning heat soak with the BBK manifold some have had problems with it.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #6  
Black X's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Why such a small cam for a larger stall. I would think you could utilize atleast a 228 duration cam with your light weight and big stall speed. Never the less nice numbers man. One of the things that you can attribute to the low spray numbers is the relative low lift of your cam, I have noticed that on a few low lift cam dynos when the engine was sprayed. Are you experiecning heat soak with the BBK manifold some have had problems with it.

The cam was chosen for fuel Milage and durability. The truck was built to be driven and does a lot of road trips. I would love to run a larger duration high lift cam but i would sacrafrice fuel economy.

As far as the BBK and heat soak... I would think it has some effect on the performance but I chose the aluminum intake so in the event of a nitrous backfire it does not shatter. I would think its robbing a few HP but thats a sacrafice i am willing to make for the peice of mind that it provides.

I didn't dyno before the intake swap but this exact setup with a stock LS1 TB and Manifold did 104mph in the 1/4 after the intake and TB swap its running 107.5mph
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Well it seems it made quite a difference. I understand on the fuel economy thing I figure this was a "toy" type deal.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #8  
Black X's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: CANADA!
Default

Its a toy for sure, But I make regular 300 mile road trips in it.

Knocks down 29mpg at 70mph with this setp
27MPG with the A/C on
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #9  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

I dont like s-10's, but this one is sweet, I wouldnt mind having that for sure!!

with that mph is should be atleast a mid 12 sec truck n/a...
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #10  
Beastofa327's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Va
Default

That was sick! Nice truck!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluecollar Hotrods
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
11
Jun 11, 2024 11:37 PM
mrhino
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
2
Aug 7, 2015 10:01 AM
FlowmasterMufflers
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Jul 17, 2015 03:26 PM
lxcoupe
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
17
Jul 14, 2015 10:14 PM
NuckenFuts
FORCED INDUCTION
32
Jul 9, 2015 08:45 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM.