GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

1500hd Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #51  
rpav's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Fontana, CA
Default

i get a record 8.5 mpg lol. 6.0, 80e, Nelson tune. When i install the blower and cam i wonder if ill get less or more
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #52  
TURBHOE's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

thats a big damn truck though. what size lift and tires you got there?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #53  
Cody Brooks's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Ardmore, Oklahoma
Default

for whatever reason 6.0 liters just use more gas than 5.3's. I would stick with a 5.3 you don't gain enough hp or torque to justify what you lose in gas mileage.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #54  
rpav's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Fontana, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 4.8T
thats a big damn truck though. what size lift and tires you got there?
hahahaha the lift is an 9 inch CST, new torsion keys turned up an inch and a 3 inch body with 40" toyos on 22x12 weld velociti's with 4:88's. just trying to piece everything together for the motor now
actually this picture is before the 3 inch body lift
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shawn96gmc
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
May 17, 2016 04:15 PM
trxmxzx
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
8
Sep 29, 2015 07:42 AM
Aboss
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
Aug 11, 2015 09:05 AM
Scott95TA
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
Jun 9, 2003 11:15 PM
Hit Man X
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
Apr 16, 2003 12:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.