Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 19,007

Likes: 221

From: Western PA

Was there a cam card in the box?

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

i thought about going bigger for a while, but I was going into the 230 range and don’t want it to be a turd- so I started thinking logically heavy truck, go for more torque - was back and forth on blower or not- kid starting school this coming year- concrete I want in my barn - figure put the blower up for sale in feb, March

ya between school and working 60hrs a week 6 days didn’t leave me much time to tinker

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

Joined: Nov 2015

Posts: 2,095

Likes: 557

From: Coastal NC

You tell BTR you were ditching to blower?

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

they didnt know I had one

Joined: Nov 2015

Posts: 2,095

Likes: 557

From: Coastal NC

I could be wrong but I think the 113+3 is the boosted application.

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

With the +3 in cam I’m moving my power band lower, for boosted apps I’m not sure, this was supposed to be there off the shelf n/a truck cam

with being 11:1 comp the +3 I may have some pretty high cylinder pressure

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

so the sales rep for BTR says ....”The +3 will not be on the cam card if i looks at the intake center line it will be a 110 which is how i will get the +3.”

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 7,271

Likes: 62

From: South Shore, MA

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 874

Likes: 13

From: Hartland, MI

That’s what I was hoping for!! I seriously stewed on the cam for these past few months vs a tsp 228 or the stage 4 BTR - or staying boosted

Just need to get different headgaskets now, I had ls9 laying around but don’t want to really run them being a 4.100” bore and just being N/A