It's there now. Forgot to delete all my personal info before I posted. Dont want any of you crazies getting my phone number or adderss

 

Don't worry, Patrick is . I'm sure this will be one hell of a Tahoe. Keeping an eye on this build.

 

Cubes eat overlap. I'm guessing you'll be OK. If PG says it's good, who are we, as mere mortals, to question?

 

What did you tell him you wanted out of the cam?

 

I see no issue with overlap as long as you stay efficient pushing the amount of boost you want to run

 

Driveabilty really. That I towed from time to time and it was a DD. Shift at 6000. That's about it...

 

With my 408 and 1900 he recommend the 218/230 .600/.600 117 and I told him basically the same thing; DD, shift at ~6200, good midrange.

 

Seems like a big jump to 231/239 .598”/.610” 116LSA with the only real difference being blower size.

 

You have different heads as I was using 317s...but ive heard the rect port heads didnt like big duration so I am really interested to see what you think of your cam.

 

I thought his recs would be closer to the cam you're selling. Your new cam would definately be noticable in a 6.0L. Don't have a clue how it would compare when you add more cubes. I know cubes tend to tame a bigger cam. That just seems like a whole lot more cam than I would think would play nice in a 6.0L.

I can see already that your snout pulley is too big. You haven't even broken the first ring land you're in need of a smaller pulley.