G-tech Meter Only But A 14.33 For The 07 Tundra
#1
my tundra on that g-meter ran a 9.08 at 97mph in the 1/8 and 14.33 in the 1/4. i know that these are not correct times but still seems good to me for a completely stock truck. i just want to know how far this thing is off. some feedback on how big of a difference the times are would help.thanks.
#6
G-techs are vehical dependent- some run close to track times some don't. Your just going to have to go to the track. I would watch out at the track some chevy guys might tie lead to your truck
#7
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
The G tech usually reads mph a tad bit high compared to the track because of the way your mph is averaged at the track. I'm pretty sure parish8 ran very close at the track to what his Gtech reports ET wise.
Great times man, congrats.
Great times man, congrats.
Trending Topics
#9
Your g-tech times are dependant on 2 things really how close you are to your:
1) "true weight to what you entered in your g-tech"
2) the setting that has to do with the suspension really can sway the g-tech either way also if stock leave it at like 2.6 cause your suspension will be sloppy.. if you have upgraded leafs,traction bars,upgraded struts like bilstein might be able to bring it down to 2.0 cause it handles more like a car
my experiences with g-tech are kinda weird.. trap speed is always identical to what it is at the track within .25 mph et is usually .2 less on the street cause traction sucks and my 60fts are always 2.35ish on the street and 1.9's on the track
learn how to lauch the pig like a pro and believe me you will definatly run down some cars that will definatly be very suprised a 5k truck beat them it's funny imo,lol
i should be running 13.8's very shortly on the motor alone, I'm revamping my whole exhaust.. Bought stillen long tube headers with the 1 5/8 primaries (the powerflows where too large had 1 3/4" primaries) my 14.2 NA time is with 3" exhaust all the way back to the y-pipe and 3 1/2" after the y-pipe.. so after studying the therories of header designs and relationships to primaries to hp/cubic displacement to achieve maximum scavaging abilities i now know my old set up was WAY OVERKILL it was built for a 450-500hp truck.. so I'm selling it all and going down to 2.25" before the y and 3" after the ypipe i expect to be in the 320-330hp region after this with an additional 25-35lbs of tq..
1) "true weight to what you entered in your g-tech"
2) the setting that has to do with the suspension really can sway the g-tech either way also if stock leave it at like 2.6 cause your suspension will be sloppy.. if you have upgraded leafs,traction bars,upgraded struts like bilstein might be able to bring it down to 2.0 cause it handles more like a car
my experiences with g-tech are kinda weird.. trap speed is always identical to what it is at the track within .25 mph et is usually .2 less on the street cause traction sucks and my 60fts are always 2.35ish on the street and 1.9's on the track
learn how to lauch the pig like a pro and believe me you will definatly run down some cars that will definatly be very suprised a 5k truck beat them it's funny imo,lol
i should be running 13.8's very shortly on the motor alone, I'm revamping my whole exhaust.. Bought stillen long tube headers with the 1 5/8 primaries (the powerflows where too large had 1 3/4" primaries) my 14.2 NA time is with 3" exhaust all the way back to the y-pipe and 3 1/2" after the y-pipe.. so after studying the therories of header designs and relationships to primaries to hp/cubic displacement to achieve maximum scavaging abilities i now know my old set up was WAY OVERKILL it was built for a 450-500hp truck.. so I'm selling it all and going down to 2.25" before the y and 3" after the ypipe i expect to be in the 320-330hp region after this with an additional 25-35lbs of tq..
Last edited by Toomnymods; May 9, 2007 at 02:49 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Aug 7, 2015 09:55 PM



