Wet/dry
#4
I wouldn't say either one is "safer". They're both completely safe with proper installation and tuning.
I recommend the wet kit because the dry kits are (hp) limited by the fuel injectors.
Of course, you may need a bigger fuel pump with either system. But, with a wet kit, you won't have to use bigger injectors. That, to me, is a plus.
I recommend the wet kit because the dry kits are (hp) limited by the fuel injectors.
Of course, you may need a bigger fuel pump with either system. But, with a wet kit, you won't have to use bigger injectors. That, to me, is a plus.
#7
Dry is safer by a matter of fact and proven track record when comparing to wet hits. Can you say swelling fuel noid plunger, or intake and hood removal, now these do not happen on a dry hit, period, so is wet safer, no way. Now wet dose have it's place, don't get me wrong, just stating the facts.
Robert
Robert
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Robert56
Dry is safer by a matter of fact and proven track record when comparing to wet hits. Can you say swelling fuel noid plunger, or intake and hood removal, now these do not happen on a dry hit, period, so is wet safer, no way. Now wet dose have it's place, don't get me wrong, just stating the facts.
Robert
Robert
never had that stuff happen to me.
#9
Originally Posted by Robert56
Can you say swelling fuel noid plunger, or intake and hood removal, now these do not happen on a dry hit, period, so is wet safer, no way.
However, it's not the most prominent problem in the world. And it's really not a problem with properly maintained kits. My small kit (Compucar) is over ten years old and this has no been a problem. My big kit (NOS) is eight years old and this hasn't been a problem. My brother's kit (NOS) is six years old and, again, this is not a problem. Remember ,the two bigger kits are NOS kits, which, IMHO, isn't the best brand out there.
But, like I said, you're right. And you provided some insight. I just don't think it's worth all the extra expense for most people who want a bigger hit than the dry kit will afford them with stock injectors.
On the other hand, there are some intake designs that require the use of a dry kit without major extra expense. So, there is a place for both, wet and dry, designs.
#10
Originally Posted by Robert56
Dry is safer by a matter of fact and proven track record when comparing to wet hits. Can you say swelling fuel noid plunger, or intake and hood removal, now these do not happen on a dry hit, period, so is wet safer, no way. Now wet dose have it's place, don't get me wrong, just stating the facts.
Robert
Robert


