INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Yet Another Head Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2018, 03:51 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cmcolfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Yet Another Head Thread

OK, so I just picked up a 5.3 block that has been bored to 3.898 as the start of my 247/5.7 build for my Suburban

Seller is throwing in a set of 862 heads.

I also came across a set of 241 heads.

I know everyone talks about the vaunted 243/799 heads, so what are your thoughts on using one of the other two sets?

I believe the 241's use the same 2" intake valves as the 243's.

The 241's combustion chambers are +/- 2cc larger while the intake runners and exhaust ports are slightly shorter/smaller.

All of this "matters" the big time LSx guys building them for F-bodies and Vettes looking for HUGE how numbers and top end.

I question how much they would make a difference that would make in my Suburban build.

Keep in mind, the Burb is a DD and part time tow rig.

I'll be running stock crank, stock rods, flat top pistons, Comp trunion upgrade, Blue LS6 springs, stock rockers, new 7.4" pushrods, new Delphi lifters, a cam in the 208-214/208-214, 108-114 LSA range, shorty headers, Flex Fuel injectors, and likely a TBSS intake.


Old 09-10-2018, 11:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Drspencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 410
Received 63 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Run the 862s. More power was made, even on a 6.0. Everyone’s gonna hoop n holler about compression ratio but I just don’t think the velocity is high enough with the larger runner. Cut the 862 .030 and send it. Also, get at least a 24” breaker bar or ratchet for the head bolts. That last 90 degrees is a real bitch.
Old 09-11-2018, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cmcolfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Drspencer
Run the 862s. More power was made, even on a 6.0. Everyone’s gonna hoop n holler about compression ratio but I just don’t think the velocity is high enough with the larger runner. Cut the 862 .030 and send it. Also, get at least a 24” breaker bar or ratchet for the head bolts. That last 90 degrees is a real bitch.
Frony research I expected my CR to be in the 10.x : 1 range based on the flat tops, larger cam and the CC size of the 241/243/799.

Don't the 862's have an even smaller CC and also the smaller intake valves? I don't have the comparison info in front of me.

I'm on my phone, I'm exhausted, it's been a long day between work, hurricane prep and finishing putting the front end of the POS back together.

Work comes early at 0400 again tomorrow.

Look forward to more feedback .

CMC
Old 09-12-2018, 10:08 AM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Drspencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 410
Received 63 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

The 862s have 61.5cc combustion chambers and 1.89/1.55 valves. Yes. They’re smaller, but we don’t have any definitive evidence that shows the smaller valve makes less power.
Old 09-14-2018, 05:29 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cmcolfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This is who I want to use to do the machine work , the assembly work that I can't do, and lean on for guidance based on what they find.

http://centralvirginiamachine.com
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve Bryant
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
24
10-13-2008 03:53 PM
phoenixxgold
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
3
06-16-2006 09:56 PM
ILLNALI
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
03-03-2006 10:53 AM
BLACKND
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
10-29-2005 08:23 PM
BLACKND
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
15
09-13-2005 10:33 AM



Quick Reply: Yet Another Head Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.