INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Question on Power difference between high compression and low compression N/A engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #1  
Spoolin's Avatar
Thread Starter
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default Question on Power difference between high compression and low compression N/A engines

Pretty muchwhat the title says...What kind of Power difference is there between a high compression and a low compression N/A engine given the same displacement and H/C/I etc...
I've been wondering about it since I started driving my low compression turbo motor around...tomorrow IRS retting Dyno tuned but I'm still curious as to how big of a loss you take with compression issues. I'm guessing the difference between 8.8:1 and 11:1 is about 100hp.


Speaking if which, any guesses on tomorrow's results? Forged 370ci motor with high flow WCCH heads, 218/218 114LSA CAM and free flowing exhaust behind a 4l80e.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #2  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

~380-400rwhp because of compression, cam, and 80e.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #3  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

There's a formula but I forget, something like each .1 CR+ = X hp.

you are dyno tuning tomorrow?

394rwhp
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #4  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I think it all depends on the cam and head combo...a high compression engine with a cam with a lot of overlap can run more timing than say a high compression with a small cam, as the engine with the smaller cam will be more prone to detonation. I believe that in most cases though, with all things being equal, and a camshaft of decent duration (somewhere in the middle of what's optimal for both high and low compression), high compression wins. I'm not an engine guru, this is just how I see it from what I've learned through the years.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

not much help, but post your results. I may end up running mine NA for a while. Only thing is im stock heads, boost cam, 10.4 CR
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #6  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
I think it all depends on the cam and head combo...a high compression engine with a cam with a lot of overlap can run more timing than say a high compression with a small cam, as the engine with the smaller cam will be more prone to detonation. I believe that in most cases though, with all things being equal, and a camshaft of decent duration (somewhere in the middle of what's optimal for both high and low compression), high compression wins. I'm not an engine guru, this is just how I see it from what I've learned through the years.
I always thought of it a little differently but i may be way off...

A high CR engine with a High DCR would have timing limitations but make more power with less timing.... Because of the build up of heat caused by the CR and DCR it would be prone to detonation this is where higher octane comes into play. A low CR engine is more forgiving on the timing meaning it could run more because it would produce less heat thus less prone to detonation but it would make less power...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #7  
Spoolin's Avatar
Thread Starter
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Well some of you guys sure optimistic!!
I'm guessing 320rwhp and that's being conservative so maybe it's more. In all fairness I've yet to actually do a full pull on the truck for various little things I've got to finish on it. Right now I'm headed down to put the Wilwood's back on and drill out the PCV so it will stop popping off...hope that drilling that valve will not create so much backpressure.
I will post up when I find out...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #8  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Well some of you guys sure optimistic!!
I'm guessing 320rwhp and that's being conservative so maybe it's more. In all fairness I've yet to actually do a full pull on the truck for various little things I've got to finish on it. Right now I'm headed down to put the Wilwood's back on and drill out the PCV so it will stop popping off...hope that drilling that valve will not create so much backpressure.
I will post up when I find out...
If you dyno 320 rwhp, you need to burn that thing to the ground...
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #9  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

1 pt is about 4%. so your down about 8-10% in power.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #10  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

im sayin youll do at least 350 RWHP liked stated above if yoiu dont make at least that then something is wrong IMO
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.