polluter cam ?
Jan 16, 2009 | 10:45 AM
#2
Going with a 24xº for torque? That's a first. Ever over-layed a 24xº intake duration camshaft with a low 230's and seen the difference in torque curves? It's a healthy difference! And no magical lobe exists that makes gobs more torque with 240º than some other 240º lobe. There are small differences in lobes, but not so much that all of a sudden a 240 cam has the bottom end of a 228 cam.
Now I'm not hating on the Pulluter, we've tested it on the engine dyno with comparable duration cams. It was in line with the rest. But I'd hate to see or hear of a truck guy buying the cam for torque alone. That's just not what these big cams are for!
Now I'm not hating on the Pulluter, we've tested it on the engine dyno with comparable duration cams. It was in line with the rest. But I'd hate to see or hear of a truck guy buying the cam for torque alone. That's just not what these big cams are for!
Jan 16, 2009 | 04:59 PM
#4
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 869
Likes: 1
From: somewhere in the sticks.
well I was not meaning it as in thats where it would shine but that it looks to do real well with nitrous and with the shot im using I do not want to run a cam that won't work well.
Jan 16, 2009 | 05:47 PM
#5
On The Tree
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Kansas/North Dakota
Going with a 24xº for torque? That's a first. Ever over-layed a 24xº intake duration camshaft with a low 230's and seen the difference in torque curves? It's a healthy difference! And no magical lobe exists that makes gobs more torque with 240º than some other 240º lobe. There are small differences in lobes, but not so much that all of a sudden a 240 cam has the bottom end of a 228 cam.
Now I'm not hating on the Pulluter, we've tested it on the engine dyno with comparable duration cams. It was in line with the rest. But I'd hate to see or hear of a truck guy buying the cam for torque alone. That's just not what these big cams are for!
Now I'm not hating on the Pulluter, we've tested it on the engine dyno with comparable duration cams. It was in line with the rest. But I'd hate to see or hear of a truck guy buying the cam for torque alone. That's just not what these big cams are for!
Jan 16, 2009 | 05:52 PM
#6
On The Tree
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Kansas/North Dakota
Edit: to be exact, already is producing around 375rwtq BY 4000 rpms, and around 330rwtq at 2500rpms. If anyone were looking for a big cam, that would be the one to get, AND, it doesn't need to be spun any higher than 6500 rpms, actually by 6000 its starting to level off, just a slight increase, pretty much flat.
Trending Topics
Jan 18, 2009 | 04:24 PM
#9
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
I've seen and tuned a f body with this cam. Sounds BADD. Pulls o.k but doesnt come "on" until up higher in rpm, Idle needs to be around 950-1050. IMO TOO big for a truck....
