INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

polluter cam ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #11  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

not yet, he plans on a running a huge shot later this year...
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 06:10 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 869
Likes: 1
From: somewhere in the sticks.
Default

nah im hoping to get in the 11's with the n2o before the cam I might just do some ls2 243's first to get my compression up and the decide on the cam I never expected to run those numbers on a stock lq4 my prediction before we got there was 13.50's but man was I wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:05 AM
  #13  
the_husk's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Kansas/North Dakota
Default

With his 3600 rpm converter and nitrous, it should work VERY well.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #14  
cowl327's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Azle Texas
Default

Originally Posted by the_husk
With his 3600 rpm converter and nitrous, it should work VERY well.
+1 With ALL of the supporting parts it would be great,but youll need a 3k plus stall,gears,headers,better intake....you know what i mean....
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #15  
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 1
From: Texas!
Default

Originally Posted by the_husk
That cam produces HUGE torque down low for a big cam, more in line with high 220's duration cams.
Show us.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #16  
maddboost's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, IL
Default

What cam would you recommend for a "torquey" setup in a truck Matt using a 6.0 motor?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #17  
the_husk's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Kansas/North Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Show us.
There's a graph floating around on ls1tech.com
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 04:03 AM
  #18  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

Originally Posted by the_husk
Edit: to be exact, already is producing around 375rwtq BY 4000 rpms, and around 330rwtq at 2500rpms. If anyone were looking for a big cam, that would be the one to get, AND, it doesn't need to be spun any higher than 6500 rpms, actually by 6000 its starting to level off, just a slight increase, pretty much flat.
Since when is that "big down low torque"??

Granted my setup is different but with the 5.3L, small cam and very low boost I was well over 400rwtq by 3000RPM and carried that up to 5250 (where the graphs crossed) and it make a peak of 517 well before that....


37xlb/ft on a 6L is in no way impressive.... There's n/a 5.3s here that make just about that.... You don't need the biggest donkey dick cam you can find to make power hp or tq either one....
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:35 AM
  #19  
the_husk's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Kansas/North Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
Since when is that "big down low torque"??

Granted my setup is different but with the 5.3L, small cam and very low boost I was well over 400rwtq by 3000RPM and carried that up to 5250 (where the graphs crossed) and it make a peak of 517 well before that....


37xlb/ft on a 6L is in no way impressive.... There's n/a 5.3s here that make just about that.... You don't need the biggest donkey dick cam you can find to make power hp or tq either one....
It's got WAY more torque down low than my buddies torquer V3. But then again, his car lacks torque all OVER the place, peaked at 343. With his stall, he would be right where he needed to be with thtat cam, plus he has a 175 shot, so it would work VERY well.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #20  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

It may work well, with a 4000 converter... But either way, those numbers aren't anything to write home about.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.