polluter cam ?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 21, 2009 | 12:00 PM

#21

the_husk

On The Tree

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 158

Likes: 0

From: Kansas/North Dakota

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o

It may work well, with a 4000 converter... But either way, those numbers aren't anything to write home about.

For not having to spin the engine really high, they are.

You're just splitting hairs now.

Jan 21, 2009 | 05:10 PM

#22

the_husk

On The Tree

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 158

Likes: 0

From: Kansas/North Dakota

The above post on the whole splitting hairs thing is just being a joke. I intended it to be sarcastic, before I hurt anyones feelings. lol

Feb 15, 2009 | 01:58 PM

#23

LMSeven

TECH Resident

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 980

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o

Granted my setup is different but with the 5.3L, small cam and very low boost I was well over 400rwtq by 3000RPM and carried that up to 5250 (where the graphs crossed

How is this comparable again? Small cam + turbo, to big cam N/A...

Feb 15, 2009 | 02:16 PM

#24

silver-mod-o

Hunt&Fisherator

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 14,314

Likes: 17

From: SETx

It really isn't, as I stated. Just for reference more than anything....

Either way you cut the pie, not impressive.

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Supercharger for towing or cam & headers

2500ZL1

8-Lug Truck Performance

Jan 25, 2016 06:30 AM

Need help with custom grind cam

lawhitediamante

INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS

Aug 12, 2015 12:14 PM

another cam thread

steves86ta

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM

turbo cam question

WICK3DxGATA

FORCED INDUCTION

Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM

5.3l cam choices.

projectnightcrawler

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM