INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Has anyone ran 823 heads on there LQ9

Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I probably could have gotten away with a tighter split. Although I cant complain a bit, I love my cam. My truck is crazy fun!!!

A lot of guys are running mid 230s cams and L92 heads on LQ9s. Hot Rod did and article with untouched L92/LS3 heads and they could fit a bigger cam too. IIRC it was either the 227/235. Cant remember exactly.....

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...est/index.html

Last edited by SweetS10V8; Apr 25, 2010 at 08:03 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:33 AM
  #12  
Yukonjackgt's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Mi
Default

I think the exhaust duration is so long due to the 1.59 valve compared to the huge 2.16 intake.
And I was wrong my motor is LQ4 dished pistons so I should be pretty safe with whatever came I run . I will still check clearance to be safe.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
Dec 27, 2016 09:30 AM
The_W
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
Oct 28, 2015 09:00 PM
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Aug 9, 2015 04:34 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
Aboss
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
Jul 9, 2015 10:28 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.