INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3L Crankshaft Polished, What bearings should I use???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 11:23 PM
  #1  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default 5.3L Crankshaft Polished, What bearings should I use???

Ok, I am doing a 5.3L rebuild and I had the Crank oil holes chamfered and the rod and main Journals Polished rather then a .010 under cut. How can I determen which Size bearing to use so I don't get the wrong ones. My crank grinder told me I could just use Standard bearings That would not need a .001 bearing. Is there any way to tell or will i just have to get a set of standard and hope they are withen spec???

I Was looking at the Celvite H series with a coating. I was told the coating was good but also they tend to be a little fatter because of the coating and might work better over a standard H series for a crank that has been polished???

Any help/recomendations on what to use would be helpfull.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #2  
AdioSS's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: East Texas 75707
Default

at first I was going to say to ask whoever did the polishing for you. But if they took 5 thou per side off the journals, then you'll definitely need bearings that are designed for that. .010" is a lot of slop. Go to another machine shop and see what they have to say.

Coated bearings are nice, but a bit overkill on a mild performance rebuild with a stock crank. Now if you were using a high dollar crank, I would highly recommend them.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:21 AM
  #3  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by AdioSS
at first I was going to say to ask whoever did the polishing for you. But if they took 5 thou per side off the journals, then you'll definitely need bearings that are designed for that. .010" is a lot of slop. Go to another machine shop and see what they have to say.

Coated bearings are nice, but a bit overkill on a mild performance rebuild with a stock crank. Now if you were using a high dollar crank, I would highly recommend them.
As I said It was polished, not cut and he told me standard size bearings would be just fine. I noticed they have standard size and .001 then it goes to .010 under. I used a very reputable crank grinder. They only do cranks.

I am Wondering if the standard size bearing will be just fine or if I will need a .001 bearing.

NOT .010 undersized.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 01:08 AM
  #4  
AdioSS's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: East Texas 75707
Default

sorry, I misread what you said.

The best answer here is to measure your journals and go off of that.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #5  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

No biggie. If I mic the journals with out having an actual bearing how will I know If I will be withen spec with a standard bearing as far as clearence goes??? I have only done ever really done that with pre assembling and using Plasti Gauge.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 02:29 AM
  #6  
454SuperSport's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Millen, GA
Default

plasti-guage isn't even worth using IMO, mic the crank and see how much was taken off first, production spec is 2.099-2.1 on the rod journals and 2.558-2.5593 on the mains.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

I would use standard size bearing if you grinder polished it and told you the crank came out with in spec. On bearing like that, I would rather haven them a little on the loose side then tight. To tight and the will seize and spin a bearing.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #8  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Default

Ya, I have been thinking about forced induction lately too! Thats why I was thinking about the coated bearings....

I Just picked up a BBQ special 5.3 over the weekend to add to my collection of stuff.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zblee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Nov 11, 2015 12:41 AM
wretched73
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
10
Oct 28, 2015 09:21 PM
Tigger Welder
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
Oct 1, 2015 08:41 AM
600 horses
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
9
Sep 10, 2015 11:01 AM
Forcefed81
GM Parts Classifieds
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.