243 vs L92 on a stock bottom LQ4
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dubai, U.A.E
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
243 vs L92 on a stock bottom LQ4
hey guys i have an LQ4 on my 2500hd sierra.. im thinking about doing a heads/cam combo
ill install ported heads as well as a custom cam , looking for mostly low/mid range torque because its used for offroading
any ideas? 243 vs L92
ill install ported heads as well as a custom cam , looking for mostly low/mid range torque because its used for offroading
any ideas? 243 vs L92
#5
Ported L92's will kill your low/mid range. If anything stock L92's will flow far enough. I still wouldn't run L92's in your app. For your app I'd go with neither. The 243's are just going to bump up your compression and that's it. Heads are good for north of 4000, so if your looking for more low/mid power choose mods that work in that rpm window.
#8
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
Ported L92's will kill your low/mid range. If anything stock L92's will flow far enough. I still wouldn't run L92's in your app. For your app I'd go with neither. The 243's are just going to bump up your compression and that's it. Heads are good for north of 4000, so if your looking for more low/mid power choose mods that work in that rpm window.