243 vs L92 on a stock bottom LQ4
#1
hey guys i have an LQ4 on my 2500hd sierra.. im thinking about doing a heads/cam combo
ill install ported heads as well as a custom cam , looking for mostly low/mid range torque because its used for offroading
any ideas? 243 vs L92
ill install ported heads as well as a custom cam , looking for mostly low/mid range torque because its used for offroading
any ideas? 243 vs L92
#5
Ported L92's will kill your low/mid range. If anything stock L92's will flow far enough. I still wouldn't run L92's in your app. For your app I'd go with neither. The 243's are just going to bump up your compression and that's it. Heads are good for north of 4000, so if your looking for more low/mid power choose mods that work in that rpm window.
Trending Topics
#8
Ported L92's will kill your low/mid range. If anything stock L92's will flow far enough. I still wouldn't run L92's in your app. For your app I'd go with neither. The 243's are just going to bump up your compression and that's it. Heads are good for north of 4000, so if your looking for more low/mid power choose mods that work in that rpm window.
#9
i wouldnt mill the 317s the chamber design sucks compared to any other ls head , 243's have have more velocity than l92s which will create that low end your looking for....do you have any plans of boost in your future?







