228 / 232 .600 112lsa in a 5.3?
Aug 5, 2018 | 02:28 AM
#11
This cam:
216/226 .600/.600 114lsa
In my 5.3 ccsb 2wd, 4l65, 2600 stall, 3:73 gears, 285/70/17
was an a absolute dog
completely disappointed
felt slower than stock
Return what you have if possible and don’t look back.
216/226 .600/.600 114lsa
In my 5.3 ccsb 2wd, 4l65, 2600 stall, 3:73 gears, 285/70/17
was an a absolute dog
completely disappointed
felt slower than stock
Return what you have if possible and don’t look back.
Aug 12, 2018 | 12:30 PM
#13
On The Tree
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 114
Likes: 7
From: Trion GA
Ive been looking at the marine 8.1's . Do you have experience with them?
Aug 12, 2018 | 01:07 PM
#14
Staging Lane
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 92
Likes: 16
From: Garland, Tx
Aug 16, 2018 | 04:27 PM
#15
On The Tree
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 114
Likes: 7
From: Trion GA
Aug 28, 2018 | 11:51 AM
#16
Launching!
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 240
Likes: 12
From: OKC
What was wrong with it? No low end, mid range, top end? Cam specs aren't bad at all for a 5.3. Stall seems small regardless though for a stock cam or aftermarket cam IMO.
Nov 15, 2018 | 08:06 PM
#18
Less low end and mid range than the stock cam. The truck felt more responsive and was quicker out of the hole when it was
stock with the 2600 stall. Didn’t want to make the jump to a 3000-3200 stall for daily drivability.
Thr truck is in the process of a Thompson MS 370 w/ 11:1 cr and I’ll be reusing the same cam/ stall, should be promising.
I’ll check back in with the results.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
low2001gmc
GM Parts Classifieds
6
May 25, 2011 05:57 AM