GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

anyone try on a new furd 6.2 or 3.5 TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #101  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

Originally Posted by rjwz28


That comparison that ran was a bad joke: Ecoboost 3.73 max tow vs Hemi 3.90 vs 5.3 3.08, uphill trailering competition. Asinine.
Ford marketing promo... what would you expect, lol. An actual "fair" comparison..... Just like any other joke comparo any manufacturers do. It should be ignored and just chalked up as "spam".
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #102  
Ieatpeople's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: westminster, md
Default

Originally Posted by 1994Vmax
Ford marketing promo... what would you expect, lol. An actual "fair" comparison..... Just like any other joke comparo any manufacturers do. It should be ignored and just chalked up as "spam".
well, to be honest, the hemi should have won that test, if it had the shortest gearing and the most power. but the "superior low end torque" from the ecoboost is what gave it the early lead and no-one could catch up.


it was heavily skewed in favor of the ford from the very beginning, but why wouldn't it be?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #103  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

The Hemi was comparable but lost due to the having less torque. Yeah, it had 3.90s, but the five-speed can't be geared as well as the six-speed in the Ford, so that's where it lost the gearing gained by the 3.90s. However, the Silverado wasn't even close to set up to compete. They equipped the Hemi as close as they could (and it performed accordingly) but they massively handicapped the Silverado. It makes me wonder if they tried it with an NHT and lost, so they went with the sure win and switched it for the 5.3/3.08 truck. They should have just gotten a 6.2/3.42 and had the guy lift the gas a bit if it was going to be too close; at least it would have looked believable and could have been called an even comparison.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 11:08 AM
  #104  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

I think in that test they did just a regular drag race against a Harley Davidson 6.2 and the Eco was either a draw or barely won. I would have to look but I paid little attention to it back when it was released.

Of course the Ecoboost had to slaughter the competition with no question. The Hemi was pretty accurate......

Last edited by 1994Vmax; Aug 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 11:39 AM
  #105  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

QUOTE=1994Vmax;4981852]I think in that test they did just a regular drag race against a Harley Davidson 6.2 and the Eco was either a draw or barely won. I would have to look but I paid little attention to it back when it was released.

Of course the Ecoboost had to slaughter the competition with no question. The Hemi was pretty accurate......[/QUOTE]



can you post test you are reffering to?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 11:55 AM
  #106  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

Originally Posted by gonzo 6.0


can you post test you are reffering to?
This isn't the video but this is where the harley versus Eco came from. They even show the Harley in one of the shots of this vid. A buddy at work that bought an Ecoboost last year showed it to me then.


There is always these two as well, which I posted earlier. And yes the camera is in the 6.2 truck.



Sorry I can't find the vid I want, but it was part of Ford's own promo stuff. They probably had it taken down, lol!

Last edited by 1994Vmax; Aug 29, 2012 at 12:06 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #107  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

have you seen the video from some ford event where the douche bag salesmen are drag racing a short distance,the ford jumped the gun everytime
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 01:33 PM
  #108  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

Originally Posted by gonzo 6.0
have you seen the video from some ford event where the douche bag salesmen are drag racing a short distance,the ford jumped the gun everytime
Yeah I think so. I would have to dig on youtube but some of that stuff is pretty funny. It's just pathetic what people try and pass off as legit, even with "video proof". Oh well.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #109  
rjwz28's Avatar
Man Motor club
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 1
From: Sunniest city on Earth
Default

Oh, it was a 5.3/3.42 CCSB Silverado vs a 5.7/3.92 Ram CCSB vs a 3.5TT 3.73 F150. My bad, thought it was a 3.08 truck.

Reply
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 03:09 PM
  #110  
NKPPhil's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Default

Well, there it is: proof positive that I don't want a GM pickup with a 5.3 and 3.42 gears for pulling a 9,000 lb trailer up long steep hills ... but I already knew that.

It would have been a more interesting and "fair" comparison if they had run the F-150 3.5TT/3.73 against an F-150 6.2/3.73 AND a GM 6.2/3.73, all with the same body configuration, 2- or 4-WD, and similar equipment. But, that's probably why they didn't do it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.