GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Any new info on FUEL ECOMONY Silverado?

Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #1  
eallanboggs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default Any new info on FUEL ECOMONY Silverado?

Anyone hear anything lately about this truck. I just read it will come in a Crew Cab w/5.3 liter V8 and 3.08 ring and pinion gear ratio. Anyone hear anything else.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #2  
SimpleManLance's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Michigan
Default

will that thing even be able to get out of its own way?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Low gears don't all ways mean better mileage, motor needs to operate in a range where it has the power to efficiently move the truck at desired speed.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
InchUp's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kbracing96
Low gears don't all ways mean better mileage, motor needs to operate in a range where it has the power to efficiently move the truck at desired speed.
What? 70mph on the interstate @ 1600rpms wont cause constant downshifting in and out of OD? But the Corvette can do it!


Oh ya, the Vette weighs half as much but has double the power with only a fraction of the wind resistance.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #5  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default

I have a GMC RCSB WT with the 3.23 gears, and have always gotten the same MPG if I am in drive or overdrive. With a slight advantage going to drive by about .3 mpg.

This has held up quite well through each mod I have done as money came available.

An old neighbor of mine had the Chevy version of my truck, and his MPG was practically the same with 4.11 gears.

I would go with the cylinder de-activation over my 4.8 if I could do it over, but I feel by the time I am done with my truck I should be averaging over 25 mpg highway.

Currently I average close to 22 Highway, and I still need headers and a tune. Also I keep about 500 pounds of various tools, and junk in my truck for work so I am not running light to take advantage of that aspect.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #6  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Jesus. 3.08? You'd get WAY worse mileage in the city.

I recently put on 31.5" tires from 30.1" tires. The switch effectively makes my 3.42s 3.31's. There is a HUGE difference on the highway in terms of being able to accelerate up hills in 4th and such. It's much more sluggish. And that's with an LQ9. I can't even imagine how shitty a 3.08 with a 5.3 would be. I'm switching to 4.10s (which would be like 3.90s with my previous tires)
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
AdioSS's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: East Texas 75707
Default

My 5.3L ECSB has 3.23s and had 30.5" factory tires. It was fine around town and definitely able to spin the tires from a stop. On the highway at 60mph I was able to get 25mpg. Going 80-90mph I was able to average over 18mpg.

It seems that changing to shorter and wider tires has hurt my mileage. I knew that going in, but it hasn't been THAT bad.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #8  
A Low Dime's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
From: Arlington (DFW), Texas
Default

My S10 gets 24 on the freeway, BUT about 14-15(maybe more/less) in the city with 3.08's. Not for sure about the city mileage, because I am only half a tank into testing city mileage, and it isnt looking pretty. My city test is with minimal pedal to floor moments.
________
Nexium injury lawyer

Last edited by A Low Dime; Sep 2, 2011 at 02:25 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #9  
SilverDog's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

Yes I think it will be offered only in crew cab or ext. cab. They are badged as XFE (Same as the cobalt, stands for eXtreme Fuel Economy). It will come with the aluminum 5.3 and the 6-speed transmission. GM also decided to use the front end off the hybrid SUV's. They idea is that GM already has these thinks laying around, why not use them to increase fuel economy (average of 1 mpg high/city).
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #10  
Neil 6.0's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: as far away from Koonerville as humanly possible
Default

Originally Posted by SilverDog
GM also decided to use the front end off the hybrid SUV's. They idea is that GM already has these thinks laying around, why not use them to increase fuel economy (average of 1 mpg high/city).
Looks the same to me?
http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/new...l-economy.html
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.