GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

TBSS intake swap on 03 LQ9 6.0

Old Feb 24, 2016 | 03:10 PM
  #41  
Wolftrk99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,492
Likes: 48
From: Virginia Beach,VA
Default

Not familiar with tuning but i woukd assume ignv is ignition voltage or battery voltage and kpa vac is vacuum in kilopascals which i would assume you would need to convert to whatever the pressure delta is measured in
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 10:46 PM
  #42  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,614
Likes: 913
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by genxhunter
I am having problems finding the correct injector data as the tunes for a gen IV injector data is listed as "injector offset vs pressure delta vs IGNV" and for the gen III trucks it's listed as "injector offset vs battery voltage vs KPA VAC". I am using some data from an 06 TBSS truck but these are not flex fuel injectors. I have a feeling that this is most of my issue. I'll keep looking around but if anyone has any suggestions, I would appreciate it. The injectors I am using are PN 12594512.
Why not use the data from an 02 flex fuel tahoe or suburban with return style system.

Or you can use 06 GMT 800 truck flex fuel data if it's at a constant 58 psi.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2016 | 04:22 PM
  #43  
genxhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, La.
Default

Happy to report the issue has been resolved. Brought the truck to a friend with a tuner shop that knew what he was doing. After adjusting my injector offset, flow rates, MAF and VE table, he determined that my #3 cylinder was firing sporadically. Turns out the plug was bad. That, along with all the adjustments has the truck running good again. Thank God that is finally over. On to better days... Hoping to go to the track this Sunday to test the performance.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2016 | 04:30 PM
  #44  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 109
From: FL
Default

Will be watching for your results. I am starting to think that using the stock 2011 fuel rails with a Corvette fuel filter might be my easiest route.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2016 | 07:44 PM
  #45  
Wolftrk99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,492
Likes: 48
From: Virginia Beach,VA
Default

Good to hear you got it cleared up

86iroc yes it is the easiest route, theres another filter i wanna say from a cobalt or cavalier that would possibly work too but i am not sure it has the regulator in it, and the vette filter comes eoth its own mounting tab....
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 03:19 PM
  #46  
genxhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, La.
Default




Time slips before and after

For those who were interested, here are my time slips. The test vehicle is a 2003 Cadillac Escalade EXT 6.0L LQ9 AWD truck with 185k miles. I have a volant cold air induction and a custom tune in both instances. The left slip is with my 75mm stock intake, stock 24lb injectors, 45psi fuel pressure, 78mm throttle body with a TB adapter plate (3 bolt to 4bolt TB) and the torque rush x-link cable. The right slip is today's run with the 87mm NNBS ported intake, same 78mm TB, xlink but running 36lb flex fuel injectors at 58psi fuel pressure. I only swapped fuel,pressures and injectors because my old fuel rail would not go over the taller intake and my stock injectors were too short. Results were .179 quicker ET and 2.56 more mph in the 1/4 mile. The truck does not come close to spinning the tires off the line and being AWD, no burnout was needed. The mph was about what I expected but I was hoping for a little better increase in ET but Ill take what I can get. The motor could be freshened up and heads reworked for more improvements but it's not in the budget right now. The motor made 345 flywheel HP from the factory but I'm probably only making 360 flywheel HP right now after all my mods and the wear & tear on it.

Last edited by genxhunter; Feb 28, 2016 at 03:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 05:33 PM
  #47  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 109
From: FL
Default

Did you by chance calculate the DA for both passes?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 05:38 PM
  #48  
genxhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, La.
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
Did you by chance calculate the DA for both passes?
DA? Not sure what that is.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 06:04 PM
  #49  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 109
From: FL
Default

Density Altitude.

DA Calculator - Density Altitude Calculator - DragTimes.com
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2016 | 06:41 PM
  #50  
genxhunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, La.
Default

Originally Posted by 86 IROC
So what does this tell me?
Stock and Mildly Modified Naturally Aspirated Engines
15.625 @ 90.089 MPH
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.