GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

some cam advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default some cam advice

i have a 03 4.8.what would be a good healthy/blower cam choice for it.i have searched for it but most of the people are sprayin with them.thanks for the info
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #2  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Seeing as it is FORCED induction.

You'd want a longer exhaust duration, w/ minimal overlap. Pick the cam suited for your power band, and no higher. Minimal overlap. I really wouldn't go with a wide lobe seperation angle. I'd use a 112 or something of this nature.

Those are just my thoughts. Thoughts I would have, before approaching a custom camshaft builder.

There's so many factors to take into hand I don't think you'll make a good choice, unless you go custom. Its a big decision. I'd personally go to Ed Curtis, or someone who's good with customs and has experience in Blower applications.


---

btw, do you have the blower yet. might wanna work on that if not

i didn't even think about that, and where it builds boost

If you don't go custom, make sure not to get hung up on the exhaust bias idea.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Seeing as it is FORCED induction.

You'd want a longer exhaust duration, w/ minimal overlap. Pick the cam suited for your power band, and no higher. Minimal overlap. I really wouldn't go with a wide lobe seperation angle. I'd use a 112 or something of this nature.

Those are just my thoughts. Thoughts I would have, before approaching a custom camshaft builder.

There's so many factors to take into hand I don't think you'll make a good choice, unless you go custom. Its a big decision. I'd personally go to Ed Curtis, or someone who's good with customs and has experience in Blower applications.


---

btw, do you have the blower yet. might wanna work on that if not

i didn't even think about that, and where it builds boost

If you don't go custom, make sure not to get hung up on the exhaust bias idea.
Close but wrong. With boost you want good lift(.550 or better), good duration(218 or better on both intake and exhaust), split duration(at least 4*. For example, 220/224), and good overlap(114LSA-119LSA)
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:47 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default

My cam choise came from Lingenfelter. They have just a little knoledge about forced induction. LOL
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #5  
one03sierra's Avatar
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 1
From: league city texas
Talking

yep you want a lobe sep. to be no less than 114 for forced induction. i think the cam snakeater is referring to is the gt2 cam. i think that is one of the cams that radix will suggest as well.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #6  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

Originally Posted by Snake Eater
They have just a little knoledge about forced induction. LOL
LOL....


Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Minimal overlap. I really wouldn't go with a wide lobe seperation angle. I'd use a 112 or something of this nature.
Huh?.....Like 02Denali said, with boost I would go with at least 114LSA. 112 has quite a bit of overlap, and it isn't considered wide for our trucks by any means....especially ones that are FI. I would go with at least 114.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:13 PM
  #7  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Close but wrong. With boost you want good lift(.550 or better), good duration(218 or better on both intake and exhaust), split duration(at least 4*. For example, 220/224), and good overlap(114LSA-119LSA)

where am i wrong? i don't remember mentioning specs to lift/duration,or the amount of overlap.

and good overlap(114LSA-119LSA
what is good overlap?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

yep you want a lobe sep. to be no less than 114 for forced induction.
Denali,

I don't see a problem with that, but couuld you please explain why

thanks
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #9  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Snake Eater
Close but wrong. With boost you want good lift(.550 or better), good duration(218 or better on both intake and exhaust), split duration(at least 4*. For example, 220/224), and good overlap(114LSA-119LSA)

Snake Eater,

Where am I wrong?

I said, MY THOUGHTS were,
-exhaust biased camshaft
-never mentioned lift
-never mentioned *'s of duration, nor *'s overlap
-A 112lsa, or of that nature. Give or take.


Pull in more area under the curve, with a tighter lobe seperation angle, BUT maintain minimal overlap. Yep, its possible. Retard the camshaft a few degrees, keeps valve events same, but held open longer. Thats an option.


and what the **** is good overlap?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #10  
one03sierra's Avatar
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 1
From: league city texas
Talking

damn. now that is good. yay throw in a 112 lsa and retard it.
just by the right cam and stick it in and it will be right. with a 112 lsa there is overlap and it is causing a vaccumn type motion. uuuhhh doh. we are going to be forcing it in there. so we dont need that. we need the valves to be closing so as to not bleed off boost.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.