New Cam and results!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 15, 2004 | 05:35 AM

#31

02Reaper

TECH Resident

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 780

Likes: 1

From: Swainsboro GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3

Yeah of course. Comparing numbers, the 220 definetly kicked butt.

Quickenuf's truck is about a ****** freak though. I was mainly comparing structure, or shape of the curve.

Yeah that thing is a freak. I'm waiting to see what some of the other trucks do with the same cam on the dyno.

Nov 15, 2004 | 09:09 AM

#32

onequick5.3

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 635

Likes: 0

I will have one for you guys in Janurary, Same as Quick's truck instead I am going with the Dynatech system and a Nelson Tune.

Nov 16, 2004 | 09:43 PM

#33

tooquick2beslo

TECH Apprentice

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 368

Likes: 0

From: Newport News, Va

Umm what are the specs on the 220 cam and who makes it ? Is it in the truck cam list at the top of this section ?

Nov 17, 2004 | 05:00 AM

#34

Sport Side

TECH Veteran

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 4,397

Likes: 0

From: Tallahassee, FL

Thunder Racing's design

220/220 .55x . 55x 112 +4 (114 + 4)

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

8.1 / 4L80E towing review

Oobray

8-Lug Truck Performance

Jun 13, 2022 03:38 AM

'09 5.3 Colorado (cammed and not quite slammed)

AHelm3

Dynamometer Results & Comparisons

Apr 8, 2016 07:51 AM

Stainless Works Through body tips

Stainless Works

THE TRUCK STOP

Nov 20, 2015 08:55 AM

Wideband install location? passenger or after merge?

zblee

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Aug 3, 2015 03:45 AM

Anyone convert to an LS7 MAF?

V-seriesTech

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Jul 28, 2015 12:28 PM