LS6 intake track results....
Nov 7, 2008 | 06:19 PM
#12
Look into the weiand street warrior intake. I wouldn't buy one until people start running them with different set ups and see their results.
Nov 7, 2008 | 07:01 PM
#14
Restricted User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: virginia
No intake is going to help what happens when you move the IVC point past 40° ABDC.... say if you have a 220°+ cam on a 112°LSA...
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here.
Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here.
Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
Nov 7, 2008 | 07:39 PM
#15
No intake is going to help what happens when you move the IVC point past 40° ABDC.... say if you have a 220°+ cam on a 112°LSA...
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here. Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here.
Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
Nov 7, 2008 | 09:09 PM
#16
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Efans....
honestly i have no problem with lowend on my truck, and i run a 220 cam... Lowend loss is usually in the tuning.... Besides my converter more than makes up if there was any loss...
??????
No intake is going to help what happens when you move the IVC point past 40° ABDC.... say if you have a 220°+ cam on a 112°LSA...
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here. Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
The cam has to match the intake and the APPLICATION, but I forgot ***** size and cam size are inversely proportional around here.
Luckily not having one means I don't have to "make up" for something.
Nov 7, 2008 | 09:15 PM
#17
Thread Starter
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
I wanted to state again, i mainly did this mod to clean up the engine bay, which i still have alot of work to do... The mod did not make me any slower, plus it help my IDC, cause i put in bigger injectors... So since it performs the same but looks 10 times better, i think I will keep it... Also I really wanted to see what it would do... Since i have a 4.8 and most people usually just swap it out for a bigger motor, no one really sees how fast you can make it... I will be swapping to a 6.0l after christmas, because I think am about topped out now....
Nov 7, 2008 | 09:43 PM
#18
I saw a test comparing the LS6, LS1, LS2 and Truck intake on an LQ9 and the LS6 and truck intake were almost identical on power. They said it wasn't worth the trouble to swap them out. The LS2 was crap and even with a 90mm TB it put down lower numbers than the LS1 intake.
Nov 7, 2008 | 11:07 PM
#19
so MY PERSONAL OPINION is truck>ls6>ssr
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM
