GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Looks like I forked up on my header choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 1
From: Bellaire, Texas
Unhappy Looks like I forked up on my header choice

No wonder my truck won't ET like I thought it should . . .

1 3/4 headers vs 1 7/8 headers my experience - LS1TECH

Comments?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:04 PM
  #2  
whitedakota's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Default

Link doesn't work for me.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:28 PM
  #3  
whitedakota's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Default

Scratch that. It worked!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #4  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Your prob not missing any power. This comes up all the time, people think that the bigger the better, just like big donkey dick cams. If your worried about it add a header spike to each one, it will aid in scavenging. You have a 6.2 in that truck, so this leaves you room to grow if you decide to boost it. I worried about the primary size at first, then did some reading, found plenty of guys going deep 11's even with 1 3/4 and only 2.5'' collectors. It's not the end of the world On another note alot of big tube headers say they give you more hp, but where at? up top for only a few more rpm, or through out the entire run.. Like I said I think you are fine.

Last edited by Mangled03gmc; Jan 30, 2012 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
01silvy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 670
Likes: 5
From: NC
Default

Wow, this good info.. ive always been kinda partial to 1 3/4" headers but now i know for sure to never stray from them.. unless i go big block.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
1slowz71's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL 818 TO D' 805
Default

wow good info , I was gonna pull the trigger on some 1 7/8 LT's from cal speed when they came available but I'l;l just stick to my old rusty pacesetters ...lol

JOHN ....bigger is better my donkey dick cam runs like a rapped ape ....lol
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #7  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Your heads have been done.. I am talking in a more so stock set up..
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #8  
1slowz71's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL 818 TO D' 805
Default

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc
Your heads have been done.. I am talking in a more so stock set up..
Oh ok disregard that then lol ........but i do nee more converter
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 07:22 PM
  #9  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

I think there are also Dyno threads that show the 1 7/8" headers not giving up anything on a LS1 that is stock outside an intake manifold swap. It was the pacesetter vs. texas speed 1 7/8" f body headers on an engine dyno.

IMO you didnt make the wrong call. Especially on that L92. There is a reason that people like those headers on the 6.2... they WORK.

P.S. I may be biased

I bought them after looking into it for a long time though. I think the bigger primaries really open the doors to a high HP build without sacrificing much down low the way people are afraid they will.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 07:31 PM
  #10  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!! - LS1TECH

And thats on a motor thats 30ci smaller that puts out almost 75 lb-ft less.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.