Just Curious About Tunes
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Just Curious About Tunes
Has anyone ever noticed a difference between the tune in a California car versus one with Federal emissions? For a GMT-900 with the 5.3, the Federal standard is GMXT05.3373 and the California standard is GMXT05.3381. Mileage and fuel use and emissions ratings are the same according to Uncle Sam but the California cars get a boost in their smog rating from 5 to 6.
About four years ago there was no physical differences between the cats but these days they do indeed appear to be physically different.
If someone is curious to compare them, I do have my original tune saved in EFILive! from BlackBear which is California emissions. Why they sent a California emissions car to a Pennsylvania dealer is beyond me.
About four years ago there was no physical differences between the cats but these days they do indeed appear to be physically different.
If someone is curious to compare them, I do have my original tune saved in EFILive! from BlackBear which is California emissions. Why they sent a California emissions car to a Pennsylvania dealer is beyond me.
The following users liked this post:
swathdiver (09-23-2021)
The following 2 users liked this post by dantheman1540:
B52Bombardier1 (09-23-2021),
swathdiver (09-23-2021)
#4
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
As far as I know with California certified vehicles, It usually jut means they paid Komifornia Extra money to certify it. In some cases like on the GMT 800 they had an EGR and Air Injection installed on the early trucks. Some times on different vehicles they may add an additional catalytic convertor. Most of the newer cars though are pretty much the same. This is Why Donald J Trump was trying to end to the Extra Certification mandated by California on car makers. The Federal certification should be the national standard that every one has agreed on. States should not impose or mandate there own restrictions.
The following 4 users liked this post by 1FastBrick:
68Formula (09-23-2021),
dantheman1540 (09-23-2021),
swathdiver (09-23-2021),
zz454Chevelle67 (09-24-2021)
The following 2 users liked this post by arthursc2:
dantheman1540 (09-23-2021),
swathdiver (09-23-2021)
#6
The following users liked this post:
swathdiver (09-26-2021)
#7
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
From what I've read, Lean Cruise was not used on Gen IV engines, it was replaced by AFM and VVT. I had not heard of Lean Cruise until this thread. Interesting stuff and sadly political.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03GMC
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
07-03-2007 07:03 PM
mjcook6
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
11
09-05-2006 09:38 PM
nosfedgta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
12-10-2005 05:47 PM