GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Which cam is best for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #1  
badd03gmc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Smile Which cam is best for me?

Im interested in camming my truck but i dont want it to be non streetable.
I was thinking a 212/218 114lsa or.... a 216/220 114lsa.

Which cam is best i plan on also getting it tuned and soon after buying a TT3000stall.

Its my daily driver and dont wanna do any two footed driving. Whats it gonna be?!
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 01:35 AM
  #2  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by badd03gmc
Im interested in camming my truck but i dont want it to be non streetable.
I was thinking a 212/218 114lsa or.... a 216/220 114lsa.

Which cam is best i plan on also getting it tuned and soon after buying a TT3000stall.

Its my daily driver and dont wanna do any two footed driving. Whats it gonna be?!
What engine are you planning on putting it in. Both cams will be perfectly streetable, the 212=218 is the more commom cam, at least more guys I have seen are using that duration cam. Get that in and a tune, call it a day.

John
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
Truckshop's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
From: Prairieville,La
Default

tr220. 112 if you want lope 114 if you dont
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #4  
maikell77's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Default

I'm between the same two cams. I've talked my self into doing a yank tt2600 converter with it, so I'm leaning towards the 216/220 cam. From what I've heard on here the 212/218 is a solid cam for stock converter, and I think it may even get by without a tune. Of course every cam works better with a good tune. I have a HP Tuners so I think either is small enough for me to give it a try.

Hope this helps if not, bump for ya.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #5  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

If you go with the 216/220, I'd go with at least a 2800 RPM converter. I was running that same cam in my 04 5.3 crew cab with 3.90 gears and a hughes performance 2500 converter, and it was suffecient, but definitely not optimal. My 60' times were not the best in the world, damn good cam though.

You'd definitely need a tune either way
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
maikell77's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Default

did you have surging issues?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #7  
20002wdchevy's Avatar
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Do you think that same comp 212/218 HI lift could be used on a stock converter? everywhere I've seen, The 212/218 has had nothing but great reviews.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #8  
maikell77's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Default

That's my understanding. Worst case the bottom end is a bit lazy. Unless you are looking for all out drag times, it's not really a bad thing. I personally think it might prolong tranny life.

As a disclaimer I've yet to buy my cam I've just been researching for quite a while.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #9  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

I wanna say wheatley was running the 212/218 hi lift on his crew cab for a while with stock converter. Ran good.

As far as the 216/220, I mean don't get me wrong it ran good even with the 2500 stall. My best 60' at the track was a 2.21 with slicks and a 5000# truck. But it would have really woke up with a 2800-3000 stall.

As far as surging. Nope, not at all. The only thing I did have issues with is it dying while in idle or reverse, but that was on the stock tune. Once I had nelson adjust the tune for the cam and headers, it ran great. I really like the 216/220 cam for a mild cam IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
1989k1500's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, MI
Default

Id get at least the 216/220 or bigger. IMO

We put a 212/218 in my friends truck and I wasnt impressed with it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.