GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

2010 2500hd 6.0 headers/ muffler search

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
2010_2500hd_6.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default 2010 2500hd 6.0 headers/ muffler search

Good morning
I am currently trying to gain more performance out of my 2010 6.0 silverado and am looking at exhausts now before I tune it. My problem is I’m wanting as much air flow as possible but do not want it very Loud. My question is if I place LT headers and go with a quiet muffler would I just be shooting myself in the foot. My overall gain needs to be torque at low rpm. I tow a trailer that weighs about 11K and do not want to blow my ears off. Any advice would be awesome thank you
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 02:37 PM
  #2  
BudRacing's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 24
From: Dunwoody, GA
Default

Magnaflow or Borla Touring would be my two suggestions for your situation. I'd skip the headers if you're primarily operating at low RPM. It'll stay quieter with a cat back only.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 06:13 PM
  #3  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

Headers will move your power band up not down where you want to keep it.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 08:52 PM
  #4  
2010_2500hd_6.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the info. It’s kinda what I was thinking also. The next thing to do is get rid of the clutch fan and get a tune on 91
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2018 | 10:28 AM
  #5  
BudRacing's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 24
From: Dunwoody, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 2010_2500hd_6.0
Thanks for the info. It’s kinda what I was thinking also. The next thing to do is get rid of the clutch fan and get a tune on 91
Upgrade the trans cooler while you're at it.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...thread-470284/
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2018 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
2010_2500hd_6.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

Good info thanks. I’m reading people running at 120-130 degrease that is awesome
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2018 | 04:39 PM
  #7  
01FormulaTA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 30
From: H-town
Default

4.10s would be one of the best bang for the buck for towing (assuming the truck has 3.73s stock)
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2018 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
1994Vmax's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 104
Default

To hell with 4.10...... go right to 4.56 if you want to gear one of those trucks. It actually makes a truck out of them and you have all the torque you want down low with the 6L90e. Yes my own 2017 is 4.56's with a tire that's just over an inch taller than stock.

I have a Borla XR1 oval on the 17 and it's kind of droney...... wasn't really happy with that but since I did the gear swap the drone is pretty well gone. I turn 2100 rpm at 70 mph for all those ready to freak out over "too much gear" because it isn't. My 17 is a 6 liter and started life a 3.73 gear truck and it was useless.... Now I actually enjoy dragging 10000 lbs behind it because it doesn't have a ton of trouble doing it.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2018 | 07:45 AM
  #9  
arthursc2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 1,517
Default

On 33s myself and wish I had 4.56
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mjl9872
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Apr 17, 2017 02:13 PM
Velocity1
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
12
May 5, 2015 07:47 PM
sand man
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
3
May 12, 2010 04:43 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.