Turbo or S/C for 6.2L? Questions...
#91
If you think the turbos are going to be fighting each other by having the filters a few inches closer, then you're dead wrong. That would assume you're saying the turbos will flow so much air that the space in between them will experience a vacuum relative to atmospheric pressure.....not gonna happen. Who sold you that bullshit information?
You need to worry about flow characteristics inside your charge piping, not out... Put the filters however you want.
You need to worry about flow characteristics inside your charge piping, not out... Put the filters however you want.
#92
I've never been one to follow the myths of the automotive industry like they're written scripture...I tend to challenge and analyze them, and your assertion is definitely a myth. Again, I'd like to know where you heard that? If it has been proven, then I would certainly like to see your source. If it turns out you're right, then I will shut my mouth.
As for evidence to the contrary...take those fancy jet cars as an example, and think of how their driver sits not more than a foot or two from the inlet of those engines. The average jet engine in those cars consumes 30,000 cubic feet of air per second. Surely the jet engine and the driver's lungs would be playing tug-o-war according to your theory, would they not? Yet it looks to me like drivers never have any problems breathing. It is the same concept for turbo intakes that are too close together.
#93
Hey if you want to dump about 15k into a project truck for me so I can prove you wrong, then be my guest! Would certainly appreciate the donation!
I've never been one to follow the myths of the automotive industry like they're written scripture...I tend to challenge and analyze them, and your assertion is definitely a myth. Again, I'd like to know where you heard that? If it has been proven, then I would certainly like to see your source. If it turns out you're right, then I will shut my mouth.
As for evidence to the contrary...take those fancy jet cars as an example, and think of how their driver sits not more than a foot or two from the inlet of those engines. The average jet engine in those cars consumes 30,000 cubic feet of air per second. Surely the jet engine and the driver's lungs would be playing tug-o-war according to your theory, would they not? Yet it looks to me like drivers never have any problems breathing. It is the same concept for turbo intakes that are too close together.
I've never been one to follow the myths of the automotive industry like they're written scripture...I tend to challenge and analyze them, and your assertion is definitely a myth. Again, I'd like to know where you heard that? If it has been proven, then I would certainly like to see your source. If it turns out you're right, then I will shut my mouth.
As for evidence to the contrary...take those fancy jet cars as an example, and think of how their driver sits not more than a foot or two from the inlet of those engines. The average jet engine in those cars consumes 30,000 cubic feet of air per second. Surely the jet engine and the driver's lungs would be playing tug-o-war according to your theory, would they not? Yet it looks to me like drivers never have any problems breathing. It is the same concept for turbo intakes that are too close together.
between my three turbo kits i dont have 15k into them, who spends 15k ?
#94
also having a directed air flow into turbos have proved to see gains at the track. I seen this first hand on a camaro. another member of this site proved his studies as well and currently is fastest street truck on this site. now if a directed/forced air is great benefit then a lack of air flow would hurt performance. not mention having turbos inward lack the air flow as you would if you had them behind the lights where this is a larger opening for air flow.
#95
gathered the info from theturboforums,ls1tech,yellowbullet. for something easy for you to search. year ago a nova with twin 70s or 76s had their turbos facing eachother on a 6litre and it was a nice dicussion of the two turbos facing that way. Parish was part of this build
between my three turbo kits i dont have 15k into them, who spends 15k ?
between my three turbo kits i dont have 15k into them, who spends 15k ?
BTW if you're gonna build me a twin turbo truck, might as well do it right, hm? lol
#96
Again, it sounds like word-of-mouth just passed on and accepted. Put a vacuum gauge in between those filters and show me the pressure drop. Otherwise, I'm not convinced. Now if you had the turbo inlets breathing through the same filter, maybe then would they actually be playing tug-o-war.
BTW if you're gonna build me a twin turbo truck, might as well do it right, hm? lol
BTW if you're gonna build me a twin turbo truck, might as well do it right, hm? lol
my setup is done right and i still didnt spend that cash on the turbo setup.
#97

Anyway, I'm done here. OP, sorry for getting your thread off track. Put your turbo intakes wherever jesus recommends...
#98
not trying to stir the pot, but i don't think i remember parish mentioning a problem with the air cleaners being close together...
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016
#99
not trying to stir the pot, but i don't think i remember parish mentioning a problem with the air cleaners being close together...
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016

#100


