FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo or S/C for 6.2L? Questions...

Old Aug 19, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #91  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
If you think the turbos are going to be fighting each other by having the filters a few inches closer, then you're dead wrong. That would assume you're saying the turbos will flow so much air that the space in between them will experience a vacuum relative to atmospheric pressure.....not gonna happen. Who sold you that bullshit information?

You need to worry about flow characteristics inside your charge piping, not out... Put the filters however you want.
if this theory is so wrong then prove it. its been proved that placement of inlets to turbos does make a difference
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #92  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
if this theory is so wrong then prove it. its been proved that placement of inlets to turbos does make a difference
Hey if you want to dump about 15k into a project truck for me so I can prove you wrong, then be my guest! Would certainly appreciate the donation!

I've never been one to follow the myths of the automotive industry like they're written scripture...I tend to challenge and analyze them, and your assertion is definitely a myth. Again, I'd like to know where you heard that? If it has been proven, then I would certainly like to see your source. If it turns out you're right, then I will shut my mouth.

As for evidence to the contrary...take those fancy jet cars as an example, and think of how their driver sits not more than a foot or two from the inlet of those engines. The average jet engine in those cars consumes 30,000 cubic feet of air per second. Surely the jet engine and the driver's lungs would be playing tug-o-war according to your theory, would they not? Yet it looks to me like drivers never have any problems breathing. It is the same concept for turbo intakes that are too close together.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #93  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Hey if you want to dump about 15k into a project truck for me so I can prove you wrong, then be my guest! Would certainly appreciate the donation!

I've never been one to follow the myths of the automotive industry like they're written scripture...I tend to challenge and analyze them, and your assertion is definitely a myth. Again, I'd like to know where you heard that? If it has been proven, then I would certainly like to see your source. If it turns out you're right, then I will shut my mouth.

As for evidence to the contrary...take those fancy jet cars as an example, and think of how their driver sits not more than a foot or two from the inlet of those engines. The average jet engine in those cars consumes 30,000 cubic feet of air per second. Surely the jet engine and the driver's lungs would be playing tug-o-war according to your theory, would they not? Yet it looks to me like drivers never have any problems breathing. It is the same concept for turbo intakes that are too close together.
gathered the info from theturboforums,ls1tech,yellowbullet. for something easy for you to search. year ago a nova with twin 70s or 76s had their turbos facing eachother on a 6litre and it was a nice dicussion of the two turbos facing that way. Parish was part of this build

between my three turbo kits i dont have 15k into them, who spends 15k ?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #94  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

also having a directed air flow into turbos have proved to see gains at the track. I seen this first hand on a camaro. another member of this site proved his studies as well and currently is fastest street truck on this site. now if a directed/forced air is great benefit then a lack of air flow would hurt performance. not mention having turbos inward lack the air flow as you would if you had them behind the lights where this is a larger opening for air flow.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #95  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
gathered the info from theturboforums,ls1tech,yellowbullet. for something easy for you to search. year ago a nova with twin 70s or 76s had their turbos facing eachother on a 6litre and it was a nice dicussion of the two turbos facing that way. Parish was part of this build

between my three turbo kits i dont have 15k into them, who spends 15k ?
Again, it sounds like word-of-mouth just passed on and accepted. Put a vacuum gauge in between those filters and show me the pressure drop. Otherwise, I'm not convinced. Now if you had the turbo inlets breathing through the same filter, maybe then would they actually be playing tug-o-war.

BTW if you're gonna build me a twin turbo truck, might as well do it right, hm? lol
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 04:18 PM
  #96  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Again, it sounds like word-of-mouth just passed on and accepted. Put a vacuum gauge in between those filters and show me the pressure drop. Otherwise, I'm not convinced. Now if you had the turbo inlets breathing through the same filter, maybe then would they actually be playing tug-o-war.

BTW if you're gonna build me a twin turbo truck, might as well do it right, hm? lol
well if you dont want ot believe that is fine, go do some searching there buddy. but you still havent proved this wrong....now its time for you to explain for others to see what you have to say

my setup is done right and i still didnt spend that cash on the turbo setup.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #97  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
well if you dont want ot believe that is fine, go do some searching there buddy. but you still havent proved this wrong....now its time for you to explain for others to see what you have to say
You know people search for God and actually find him...you're telling me that's hard evidence??

Anyway, I'm done here. OP, sorry for getting your thread off track. Put your turbo intakes wherever jesus recommends...
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 05:13 PM
  #98  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

not trying to stir the pot, but i don't think i remember parish mentioning a problem with the air cleaners being close together...

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016

Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #99  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
not trying to stir the pot, but i don't think i remember parish mentioning a problem with the air cleaners being close together...

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=413016

the topic came up in the past on ls1tech and another FI sight but its been awhile
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #100  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
the topic came up in the past on ls1tech and another FI sight but its been awhile
Oh, what was the result f moving them? More boost, more consistant boost, etc?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.