FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reverse split cam question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
Hawaiian_Built's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default Reverse split cam question

I'm thinking about going the turbo route in the near future. I have the following cam installed 220/218 .564/.562 114LSA. I came out of a turbo'd LQ4 RCSB. I've done some reading and not everyone agrees with reverse split cams for turbos. I plan on leaving this cam in when I do the turbo but the difference is that my truck is a 5.3l. I know there are many variables but what is your opinions on running this cam in a 5.3l turbo application?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 04:40 AM
  #2  
JoeyGC5's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 1
From: St Joe, MO
Default

I'm running an old SLP 234/228 0.571/0.582 113 cam in my PT88 5.3 rcsb. Its a dog below 3k, but cruising is comfortable, idle draws attention, and it makes a butload of power in boost. This cam was in my ex-gf's 6.0 camaro years ago and made good NA power, so I thought it's free why not give it a shot. Stock48 made killer power with a 212/212 and there are others who will suggest a more suitable cam, but if money is tight give it a go.

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...me-fun-494749/
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #3  
Hawaiian_Built's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyGC5
I'm running an old SLP 234/228 0.571/0.582 113 cam in my PT88 5.3 rcsb. Its a dog below 3k, but cruising is comfortable, idle draws attention, and it makes a butload of power in boost. This cam was in my ex-gf's 6.0 camaro years ago and made good NA power, so I thought it's free why not give it a shot. Stock48 made killer power with a 212/212 and there are others who will suggest a more suitable cam, but if money is tight give it a go.

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...me-fun-494749/
Thanks for the input. I wasnt planning on changing it out unless results arent that great. I figured since its already in there why change it. I just wanted to hear some opinions on the reverse split cams. I have seen some pretty impressive numbers/times
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #4  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I had a 236/230 and hated it with my turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
Hawaiian_Built's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

^^^^ you had a 6L right. Maybe too big for that heavy truck
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

410, so 6.7L
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

I'm using a reverse split in mine and it works just fine.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 06:55 PM
  #8  
gavin2005's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: baxley,ga
Default

im running a reverse split cam that pat g spec'd for me.seems to work good.i will have times shortly
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM
Jake75
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
Aug 5, 2015 01:26 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
MileHighSierra
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
3
Jul 12, 2015 12:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.