FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

408+what=750rwhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #91  
8ALTNG's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

Originally Posted by DanaliHD
was that directed at me? not sure what is meant by that. Definately not trying to make 2000hp. not even trying to make 1000hp. i just want whatever setup is the most responsive on the street and that will let me hit 700+ hp on pump gas.

is that too much to ask?
He is saying that you are going to be limited by your truck with the performance that you will get out of it. No matter what setup you do you are going to be limited. Thats all.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #92  
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by 8ALTNG
He is saying that you are going to be limited by your truck with the performance that you will get out of it. No matter what setup you do you are going to be limited. Thats all.
well duh, lol. it's a 6300lb truck. but seriously, would there be any valid reason to not get the whipple? i'm very excited about it. either way i'm sure i'll be psyched, turbo or whipple. They're gonna cost about the same either way as far as i can tell. The money i save by not buying the intake etc, i could put into the 10rib setup to ensure no belt slippage.

since i've never driven a turbo truck, i have no idea what to expect. i think i know what to expect with the whipple since i've had one on my truck for 3 years. I'm just hoping i'm right.

i'll ask bryan the specs on the cam.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 09:20 PM
  #93  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

you dont have to worry about too much low end tq with that whipple. you have the driveline to take the power an the weight where you will need it. a turbo with a little brake boost will make insane tq down low too.

the only advice i have to add is it seems you have a lot of options. dont get in a big rush deciding.

turbos are prooven and i think you will be quicker with one. the whipple is one bad *** looking set up. it would be cool to be one of the first guys out there geting to play with one. on the other hand you may have some unanticiapted problems with it since you are the first.

the tank up front isn't a bad idea. i dont think you would need over a 1 gallon cell, unless you plan on some top end runs(hmm, better go 2 gallon). do you use a sealed tank? if it isn't sealed then you would need some kind of pump for the high mounted return line right?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #94  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
the tank up front isn't a bad idea. i dont think you would need over a 1 gallon cell, unless you plan on some top end runs(hmm, better go 2 gallon). do you use a sealed tank? if it isn't sealed then you would need some kind of pump for the high mounted return line right?
I wouldn't think you would need a pump to help it to flow back. I would think a sealed tank and a larger return line to keep the pressure down in the tank during low fuel demand times. Probably a 1/2 - 5/8" hard line would work best. It should vent itself through the factory tank and it's vents. I like this idea. Don't think I will need it though.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #95  
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Default

i put a deposit on the turbo about an hour ago. So, no whipple.

Now i need to decide on a fuel system. $800 for the injectors and converter, $950 for the speed-eng 1000hp fuel setup, $1000 for the vic jr with rails and elbow plus NW90MM $2750 plus shipping.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 05:25 AM
  #96  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
What did you say? I can't hear you lalalalalala


You may have been right, but you still use a MAF!!
We'll be switching it to 3 bar.The MAF actually works pretty good when done right.PUREVL's 800rwhp (pump gas) still has one and Harlen use to run them on his 1000+hp setup
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #97  
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
We'll be switching it to 3 bar.The MAF actually works pretty good when done right.PUREVL's 800rwhp (pump gas) still has one and Harlen use to run them on his 1000+hp setup
i just saw something yesterday about the maftpro. 3 bar or 5 bar. if I were to get that, would it work in conjuction with the 1 bar hptuners i already have? that's the part i was confused about.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 07:29 AM
  #98  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Originally Posted by DanaliHD
i just saw something yesterday about the maftpro. 3 bar or 5 bar. if I were to get that, would it work in conjuction with the 1 bar hptuners i already have? that's the part i was confused about.
No idea,I'm ussing EFIlive.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #99  
Keith's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Mefis
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
We'll be switching it to 3 bar.The MAF actually works pretty good when done right.PUREVL's 800rwhp (pump gas) still has one and Harlen use to run them on his 1000+hp setup
Pretty sure that Harlan was running two MAF's on that setup with some magic electronic wizardry under the hood.

It's interesting to see GM go from a MAF setup on the early TPI's to a speed density setup on the later TPI's and LT1's, then back to a MAF on the LSx's
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 01:57 AM
  #100  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

They ran a maf on all of the LT1's except 92/93's. It's not just the LSx's engines, but all of the gen III's. Most of the LSx engines used the smaller maf. The LQx, LMx, and LRx used the larger maf since their release.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.