FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.8L 80mm Single Dirty Grandpa Truck Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2014 | 03:55 PM
  #181  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Not going to sugar coat it, that doesn't sound too awesome :/ Who built the trans and/or installed the shift kit? Whats all in it?
My 4L80e suffers from the same thing. I can command it to shift at 3800 and it still bounces off the limiter before going into second. It's annoying as hell and is directly related to power like GMCtrk stated with his. At 5psi, it shifts normal but at 12psi, it just doesn't want to shift into second at all. 1-2 shift doesn't happen until I let off the throttle and get back into it. 2-3 shift is perfect every time. A local guy rebuilt my 4L80e but it was back when I wasn't making any power so I'm sure it was more of a stock rebuild.

OP, stupid question I know but I'm new to the turbo world. How do you plot RPM and VE % on the compressor map like that? How do you calculate compressor flow?
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 06:47 PM
  #182  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Not going to sugar coat it, that doesn't sound too awesome :/ Who built the trans and/or installed the shift kit? Whats all in it?
It's not a trans issue, it's a PCM issue. I've logged the shifts and the trans shifts immediately when the pcm commands. I know Parish had this issue years ago.
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 08:06 PM
  #183  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
It's not a trans issue, it's a PCM issue. I've logged the shifts and the trans shifts immediately when the pcm commands. I know Parish had this issue years ago.
Well wtf, yo.
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 08:08 PM
  #184  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by oakley6575
OP, stupid question I know but I'm new to the turbo world. How do you plot RPM and VE % on the compressor map like that? How do you calculate compressor flow?
Im not the OP but Ill shed some light.

Volumetric flow of the engine is easy



Trouble is that VE is a tricky number. OP assumed 85% well...VE is a strong function of RPM and is different for every cam and engine size, and is also a strong function of boost pressure. The higher the boost the better the VE. Engine VE will peak at peak torque, always, this is cam-dependent. Induction VE will peak at peak boost, always. Engine VE decreases on either side of peak torque.

So really drawing the engine as a straight line across the compressor map is very rough, it should really be kind of wavy depending on where the induction and engine VE combine to form the overall engine VE.

Compressor flow is given by the map itself.

Also notice the speed lines on the map...for a compressor to maintain constant boost through the whole range is HAS TO speed up. If you are dropping boost, you are either choking the turbo or have a wastegate issue.
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 08:09 PM
  #185  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
It's not a trans issue, it's a PCM issue. I've logged the shifts and the trans shifts immediately when the pcm commands. I know Parish had this issue years ago.
Did you change both shift rpm and speed or just one of them? Just the WOT tables or the part throttle tables that match the WOT tables too?
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 10:03 PM
  #186  
smokeshow's Avatar
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default

3456? Yeah I know you made that **** up, Richard.
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 10:17 PM
  #187  
boostedsl2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Default

Using compressor maps how I've plotted is just a loose guess. It's close, but atomic is right about ve changing throughout the power band. The idea is thst you want all plotted points on the map. Too far right or left indicates that the compressor is too big or small. I like to put redline in the far right of the map. You reside there for very little time and considering most ls ' can't hold peak torque that high, it's pretty safe. The points on the map are air requirements that the engine needs at a given rpm, ve and psi.
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 11:13 PM
  #188  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
3456? Yeah I know you made that **** up, Richard.
12^3 (to convert cubic inch to cubic foot) * 2 (4 stroke engine) = 3456
Reply
Old May 8, 2014 | 07:24 AM
  #189  
boostedsl2's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Default

turbobygarrett.com has a bunch of tech info on compressor maps. If you're interested I'd considering taking a peek.

Here's a link to how to plot an engine's required airflow on a compressor map.

Plotting Points on Maps | Turbobygarrett

The other thing to take into account is that compressor maps aren't giving you a whole picture. The maps themselves are based on specific conditions, therefore not being accurate for all configurations. Again, these are used as a baseline for picking the right size.

You'll also notice mfg's that don't have them. This is because of a couple reasons. First being they are too small and don't have the r&d group to create the maps. The second reason has more to do with current technology. Before advance CNC technologies could be purchased for a reasonable price, mfg's had to put a considerable amount of research in both the compressor and turbine wheels to avoid having defects after a production run. You'll notice that there are a lot more maps for older compressors. The idea is that they wanted to get it right before they ran 100k compressors in a production run.

In today's mfg, the access to cheap CNC allows mfg's to tweak profiles and spit out a new compressor in a matter of hours. that's why everything is billet. Keep in mind that billet is not a better because it's material and machining, but better because they will tweak the original profile to get the best performance.

A prime example of how this can go the other way is the batmowheel from bullseye. From what I understand and someone can chime in, the batmowheel is more a gimmick and in fact flows less than the stock cast counter part directly from borg warner.

You'll also notice that companies like precision only put a HP rating on their wheels and do not supply maps. I would assume because they are tweaking their profiles actively, the cost associated with producing maps isn't worth it. I believe they rate their turbos based on calculations but I also believe they are relaying heavily on real world application.

One thing to note is that compressor wheels haven't changed all that much over the last 30 years. If you're trying to size a turbo from precision you can compare an older t series garrett map but take into account that the precision unit will flow more. It will be a little misleading, but will get you in the right spot.
Reply
Old May 8, 2014 | 09:10 AM
  #190  
jtomasik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Boosted, have you run across any/many groups using CFD analysis? I do a lot of analysis work (FEA, CFD, thermal, multi-physics, etc.), and I'd imagine it's a tall order to try to do a CFD analysis with a spinning turbine (unless you're NASA and can burn the taxpayer money like it's going out of style....lol...I've done it with some impellers, and it was a bit of a challenge for the software). Just curious, since the analysis tools have gotten much more powerful and accurate over the past 20 years, I wonder if these complex analysis has worked it's way down to the small companies. I know I could probably set up and successfully run these analysis, but it might still be at a point where emperical testing coupled with quick-turn CNC is more efficient (in the development world...which I live in....it's often a compromise).

Oh, my big prob is spec'ing a cam. Looks like I just need to talk to a few of the cam companies, as their specification templates on their websites seem geared more towards N/A vehicles and not boosted ones. Who have you had the best experience with?

Last, you gonna put that thing on a dyno or the track? Me being a numbers guy wants to be fed some numbers, even though that wasn't your stated objective early on.

Last edited by jtomasik; May 8, 2014 at 11:07 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.