4.8L 80mm Single Dirty Grandpa Truck Build
#142
it's mostly 304, there are a few 316 el's in there. You mean you like the mill finish on there?
I hit the pipes with a ss wire wheel. depending on the suppliers you'll get different mill finishes, so it would look pretty messed up if i didn't wire wheel them. It also welds 1000% better if you wire wheel first.
I'm using 316ss rod on the pipes and 309 on the ss to mild flange.
I hit the pipes with a ss wire wheel. depending on the suppliers you'll get different mill finishes, so it would look pretty messed up if i didn't wire wheel them. It also welds 1000% better if you wire wheel first.
I'm using 316ss rod on the pipes and 309 on the ss to mild flange.
Nice work. No concerns about thermal-induced movement of the head across that solid mounting flange? I've heard the flange should be split in a few areas. I'll be fabbing up my own headers, and that was the route I was going. Any issues with this?
#143
Is that only a turbo manifold design concern or generalized for any solid flange? Only reason I ask is because every set of LS headers Ive ever used or seen, shorty or long tubes, have always had a solid flange rather than the split design of the factory manifolds. Forgive my ignorance, I've just never heard that brought up before with header or manifold design.
#144
From what I've seen, most of that stress is taken out after you heat cycle the manifold a few times.
I've made maybe 70~80 manifolds and never cut one.
#145
Is that only a turbo manifold design concern or generalized for any solid flange? Only reason I ask is because every set of LS headers Ive ever used or seen, shorty or long tubes, have always had a solid flange rather than the split design of the factory manifolds. Forgive my ignorance, I've just never heard that brought up before with header or manifold design.
If you don't keep the flange cool and bolted straight you can warp it 1/2" pretty easy.
#146
lol, no worries. you're the second guy to make the AFC comment.
I love the AVCR. I've had it for about 12 years. Still doing its thing. I'm hoping to hook up the VSS soon so i can do boost by gear and all that jazz.
I love the AVCR. I've had it for about 12 years. Still doing its thing. I'm hoping to hook up the VSS soon so i can do boost by gear and all that jazz.
#148
Is that only a turbo manifold design concern or generalized for any solid flange? Only reason I ask is because every set of LS headers Ive ever used or seen, shorty or long tubes, have always had a solid flange rather than the split design of the factory manifolds. Forgive my ignorance, I've just never heard that brought up before with header or manifold design.
I have an LM7 in my truck and an LH6 on a stand in my garage getting rebuilt to take on the turbo. The one in my truck has aftermarket headers, and the flange is split. The stock manifold I took off the LH6 was split, too. With aluminum heads on both (the LH6 is an aluminum block as well), the thermal expansion differential between the stainless or cast of the headers vs. those heads is pretty big. I used to be a wrench for Caterpillar and Cummins, and both would divide the manifold into sections, with sliding joints joining them. Also, I read the pdf "Maximum Boost", and he brought it up in there, which got me thinking about it. It makes sense, but as this guy has pointed out, it doesn't seem to be necessary. I will probably still do it, after reading his comment about having to weld it on large blocks of aluminum. Maybe with shorter sections the likelihood of warping will be less (less welding per section). Dunno. But, I'll give it a shot. Obviously "boostedsl2" has a lot more personal experience than I do in this instance. Helluva manifold he built....the way he joined his tubes is very cool (something shown on that Maximum Boost document as well).
#149
It's a pain to setup if you haven't done it, but I've setup a few of these and really like it.
#150
I have an LM7 in my truck and an LH6 on a stand in my garage getting rebuilt to take on the turbo. The one in my truck has aftermarket headers, and the flange is split. The stock manifold I took off the LH6 was split, too. With aluminum heads on both (the LH6 is an aluminum block as well), the thermal expansion differential between the stainless or cast of the headers vs. those heads is pretty big. I used to be a wrench for Caterpillar and Cummins, and both would divide the manifold into sections, with sliding joints joining them. Also, I read the pdf "Maximum Boost", and he brought it up in there, which got me thinking about it. It makes sense, but as this guy has pointed out, it doesn't seem to be necessary. I will probably still do it, after reading his comment about having to weld it on large blocks of aluminum. Maybe with shorter sections the likelihood of warping will be less (less welding per section). Dunno. But, I'll give it a shot. Obviously "boostedsl2" has a lot more personal experience than I do in this instance. Helluva manifold he built....the way he joined his tubes is very cool (something shown on that Maximum Boost document as well).
If i were to build a mild manifold i would consider slitting the flange. The stainless pipes will allow for a lot of movement which cuts down on cracking. I also recommend using mild flanges over stainless in all conditions.
You can buy drops off of ebay for $40, which even if you're doing one set will help you tremendously.
Here's an example (little more expensive at $65). you can usually find these drops at a local metal shop/supplier too. You'll have to haggle with them on the price but, they'll match ebay usually.
6061 T6511 Aluminum Flat Bar 2" x 4" x 24"Long | eBay
I would not recommend welding a header flange without bolting it down. You can use a cylinder head, but it's a pain in the *** while you're trying to weld because you've got this huge base that you have to man handle. Makes it hard to be in a comfortable position which ultimately shows in your welds.
Here's a pic of one of the aluminum blocks I use.


