L76 vs L92 intake dyno
07-02-2012, 10:24 PM
#42
Staging Lane
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been reading some conflicting information on this topic.. for example the thread below. The flow numbers clearly show the l76 intake as superior, but the dyno on this thread shows the l92 on top. Any insight? I might just be overlooking something.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=686006
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=686006
07-20-2012, 06:25 AM
#43
lots of confilicting info. 2 things to ponder are the l92 has longer runners and the ls3 is a variation of the ls2 which dont flow that flow good so i am leaning towards the l92 being better. a buddy, chevrolade also tried both and swapped back to the l92 with a 227-235 comp lsr cam. just my 2 cents from previous knowledge and experience.
07-20-2012, 07:54 AM
#44
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: pearsall.tx
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ls3/l76 intake is not good at all on a truck , I had mine on for about a week .... Went back to the truck l92 and worked better like it did before.
I never got to dyno before and after but I did feel a loss in my take off with the ls3intake , one thing it pulled good to 7300 rpm , but so did the l92
I never got to dyno before and after but I did feel a loss in my take off with the ls3intake , one thing it pulled good to 7300 rpm , but so did the l92
07-25-2012, 01:42 PM
#48
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
