Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

L76 vs L92 intake dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #21  
OnyxSilveradoSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

I thought gm hitech or someone else did some intake testing and they found the truck intake better, even better than the LSXrt (new fast truck intake)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #22  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Originally Posted by YenkoST
Sorry for bring this back up, Alivn (PCM4LEss) just did a dyno on his 6.0L L92 head setup that he has on his TB SS. He posted the dyno chart on tbssowners.com but the L92 truck intake made 10 hp and 10 ft lbs of torque at the wheels over the car intake.
Great! I'll have to find that.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 09:58 AM
  #23  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

Here it is. Post #33
http://www.tbssowners.com/forums/sho...ke+dyno&page=2
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2010 | 06:48 AM
  #24  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I have tested the L76 car intake vs the L92 truck intake. I can get the graph tommorow.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2010 | 06:56 AM
  #25  
supercharged680's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, U.A.E
Default

*waits*
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 09:32 AM
  #26  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I meant to say monday, ive been on vacation for a week and forgot what day it was..... Wait one more day...

EDIT: I totally forgot to get the info, first day back, busy as could be.

Last edited by SweetS10V8; Jun 14, 2010 at 06:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #27  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Im emailing myself a reminder.......I didnt even give this a thought this week.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #28  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I remembered them , I have two different LS3 setups that were tested. I just have a few errands to run and Ill scan & post them later tonight.

The L92 is a little better, not by a ton though.

A 6.2L with 1 3/4" headers into a single 3" and a camshaft. This one made 8-10 Flywheel horepower from 4500-5700



Last edited by SweetS10V8; Jun 21, 2010 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #29  
SweetS10V8's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by OnyxSilveradoSS
I thought gm hitech or someone else did some intake testing and they found the truck intake better, even better than the LSXrt (new fast truck intake)
Nope, the FAST is much better than any GM intake. Spectacle just tested an TBSS vs a FAST LSXRT and the FAST beat it by 20rwhp on a STOCK 5.3L. So it should be worth 30rwhp over a regular "Big Ugly" intake.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #30  
gnasty1521's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Central TX
Default

I know this is old by a year, but is there any validity to the above statement? Anybody test the L92 FAST intake?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.