L76 vs L92 intake dyno
#26
I meant to say monday, ive been on vacation for a week and forgot what day it was..... Wait one more day...
EDIT: I totally forgot to get the info, first day back, busy as could be.

EDIT: I totally forgot to get the info, first day back, busy as could be.
Last edited by SweetS10V8; Jun 14, 2010 at 06:09 PM.
#28
I remembered them
, I have two different LS3 setups that were tested. I just have a few errands to run and Ill scan & post them later tonight.
The L92 is a little better, not by a ton though.
A 6.2L with 1 3/4" headers into a single 3" and a camshaft. This one made 8-10 Flywheel horepower from 4500-5700
, I have two different LS3 setups that were tested. I just have a few errands to run and Ill scan & post them later tonight.The L92 is a little better, not by a ton though.
A 6.2L with 1 3/4" headers into a single 3" and a camshaft. This one made 8-10 Flywheel horepower from 4500-5700
Last edited by SweetS10V8; Jun 21, 2010 at 07:52 PM.
#29
Nope, the FAST is much better than any GM intake. Spectacle just tested an TBSS vs a FAST LSXRT and the FAST beat it by 20rwhp on a STOCK 5.3L. So it should be worth 30rwhp over a regular "Big Ugly" intake.


