Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Ok Guys Got Hpt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:14 AM
  #31  
jakebdb56's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by CHEVRACER83
ok guys how do i post a file?? right now i just did the comanded afr and mod of pe mode tell me if this looks safe/ok??

oh wait...
if you posted a log of some WOT action from a dead stop and maybe a few from a good downshift that'd help to see what's going on timing wise. good start though. the little guy on your right shoulder is telling you to disable t/m lol

Also, logging any KR would be sweet too.

jake
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:20 AM
  #32  
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Default

Originally Posted by jakebdb56
if you posted a log of some WOT action from a dead stop and maybe a few from a good downshift that'd help to see what's going on timing wise. good start though. the little guy on your right shoulder is telling you to disable t/m lol

Also, logging any KR would be sweet too.

jake
the little guy on my right soulder is telling me a turbo would give me a reason to go more aggressive on the tuning

yeah ill do some stop start runs to let you guys see whats going on, and a few downshifts to see how it does
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:25 AM
  #33  
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Default

does the peeq look ok?? i went ahead and went with 1.12 which should go for a commanded 13.107 so if i add the same correction factor s yours... about 13.607 to 13.807 which is still a little fat, but much better than stock
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #34  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

I'm looking through your file right now shannon...anything I should look at?
I think someone should make a glossary of all these terms and what they actually mean!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 03:03 AM
  #35  
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
I'm looking through your file right now shannon...anything I should look at?
I think someone should make a glossary of all these terms and what they actually mean!
go under engine, then fuel, then power enrichment... i changed the power enrichment requested air fuel ratio, and the requirements and rpm power enrichment starts at
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 03:10 AM
  #36  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

This is the screen where you tell the computer to continue adding fuel until you reach your desired AFR?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 07:51 AM
  #37  
truckmann's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by usabodyguard
here is supposedly a really good book... a lot of the guys on sss.com have bought this and it is highly recommended...

http://www.amazon.com/Engine-Managem...6281632&sr=8-2

the author posts up on HP tuners board a lot...

NO GO READ A BOOK before you waste a perfectly good engine!
I have that book. It's ok although it is mostly basic theroy and I was hoping for more in depth tuning info. I got mine through Wal-mart.com a little cheaper than Amazon.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #38  
truckmann's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

Ok looks like you PE is actually a little lean for WOT. Here is what I am using.
Code:
1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844	1.15527	1.16113	1.16797	1.16797	1.16309	1.15820	1.15332	1.14844	1.14844	1.14844
Which should net you from about 12.8 down to 12.5 in the approx max tq areas.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #39  
truckmann's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,894
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

As far as TM goes I would at the least cut the stuff in the Engine > TM > General > Spark Retard vs. TQ reduction down by 50%. I would personally set that table to all 0, but if you want to leave some in for peice of mind that's up to you. That is where you loose most of you timing due to TM. Also I would set that Max Torque box to the maximum of 640.

There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off... You just need to set it to disable then it will ignore whatever numbers are in the boxes below.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #40  
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Default

Originally Posted by truckmann
As far as TM goes I would at the least cut the stuff in the Engine > TM > General > Spark Retard vs. TQ reduction down by 50%. I would personally set that table to all 0, but if you want to leave some in for peice of mind that's up to you. That is where you loose most of you timing due to TM. Also I would set that Max Torque box to the maximum of 640.

There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off... You just need to set it to disable then it will ignore whatever numbers are in the boxes below.
SWEET... SOUNDS GOOD BRO... HOW DO I ADJUST MY TIMING IN SMALL STEPS?? THE TABLE I FOUND WITH TIMING LOOKS KINDA CONFUSING.. DO I HAVE TO CHANGE EACH CELL INDIVIDUALLY??
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.