Ok Guys Got Hpt
#31
lolAlso, logging any KR would be sweet too.
jake
#32
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
if you posted a log of some WOT action from a dead stop and maybe a few from a good downshift that'd help to see what's going on timing wise. good start though. the little guy on your right shoulder is telling you to disable t/m
lol
Also, logging any KR would be sweet too.
jake
lolAlso, logging any KR would be sweet too.
jake

yeah ill do some stop start runs to let you guys see whats going on, and a few downshifts to see how it does
#33
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
does the peeq look ok?? i went ahead and went with 1.12 which should go for a commanded 13.107 so if i add the same correction factor s yours... about 13.607 to 13.807 which is still a little fat, but much better than stock
#35
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
go under engine, then fuel, then power enrichment... i changed the power enrichment requested air fuel ratio, and the requirements and rpm power enrichment starts at
#37
here is supposedly a really good book... a lot of the guys on sss.com have bought this and it is highly recommended...
http://www.amazon.com/Engine-Managem...6281632&sr=8-2
the author posts up on HP tuners board a lot...
NO GO READ A BOOK before you waste a perfectly good engine!
http://www.amazon.com/Engine-Managem...6281632&sr=8-2
the author posts up on HP tuners board a lot...
NO GO READ A BOOK before you waste a perfectly good engine!
#38
Ok looks like you PE is actually a little lean for WOT. Here is what I am using.
Which should net you from about 12.8 down to 12.5 in the approx max tq areas.
Code:
1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844 1.15527 1.16113 1.16797 1.16797 1.16309 1.15820 1.15332 1.14844 1.14844 1.14844
#39
As far as TM goes I would at the least cut the stuff in the Engine > TM > General > Spark Retard vs. TQ reduction down by 50%. I would personally set that table to all 0, but if you want to leave some in for peice of mind that's up to you. That is where you loose most of you timing due to TM. Also I would set that Max Torque box to the maximum of 640.
There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off...
You just need to set it to disable then it will ignore whatever numbers are in the boxes below.
There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off...
#40
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
As far as TM goes I would at the least cut the stuff in the Engine > TM > General > Spark Retard vs. TQ reduction down by 50%. I would personally set that table to all 0, but if you want to leave some in for peice of mind that's up to you. That is where you loose most of you timing due to TM. Also I would set that Max Torque box to the maximum of 640.
There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off...
You just need to set it to disable then it will ignore whatever numbers are in the boxes below.
There doesn't really appear to be much TM in the tranny tab for normal driving. The Abuse mode I believe is what tries to keep you from being able to do things like a nice smoky burnout...Turn that crap off...


