Notices
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring HP Tuners | EFILive | Hand Held Programmers | Stand Alone PCM's | Electronics | Wiring Diagrams

Any advantage MAF vs 2bar SD tuning for low boost daily driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2019, 06:45 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
black04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,406
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Any advantage MAF vs 2bar SD tuning for low boost daily driver?

I picked up a turbo kit for my 03 Silverado extended cab which is my daily driver. I am planning to run 7-9lbs on my LQ9. I have been using HPtuners myself learning as I go. Currently the truck just has bolt ons with cam, MAF tuned and runs pretty well. My other 04 Silverado turbo truck has a 2bar SD tune but it's mainly a weekend truck, avoid sitting in traffic, doesn't go on long trips.

Is there any advantage to keeping the MAF for daily driving? SD tuning has been easier but I don't mind putting in the extra effort to tune the MAF if it will be better in day to day driving.
Old 04-10-2019, 06:54 PM
  #2  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

If it’s the stock MAF it may max out before you hit that boost target. I like SD, but I don’t daily mine.
Old 04-11-2019, 08:02 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

I’ve been running an SD tune for years NA.

I prefer it. It seems to run better/smoother.

When I had the Whipple, it was SD as well and didn’t have any issues with it and it ran well.
Old 04-11-2019, 06:52 PM
  #4  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Mines been 2bar OLSD since like 06’ , 3bar now but same difference.
Old 04-11-2019, 07:57 PM
  #5  
Launching!
 
randeez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 275
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

i left it on mine (so far) it's from a stock 6.2 so i think can scale larger than the older one. but it maxes out at 86lb/min which is like part throttle on 6psi 5000rpm.

it's not hard to tune just set up the table in the scanner its just one line to modify same as sd. scan/copy/multiply % .5/ repeat
Old 04-11-2019, 09:29 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
black04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,406
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Mines been 2bar OLSD since like 06’ , 3bar now but same difference.
Originally Posted by madmann26
I’ve been running an SD tune for years NA.

I prefer it. It seems to run better/smoother.

When I had the Whipple, it was SD as well and didn’t have any issues with it and it ran well.
I run 2bar CLSD without issues on my regular cab turbo truck but every time i drive it I'm always logging and making adjustments. Since this one is my daily I'd rather leave my laptop at home, just wondering which compensates better in turbo applications for variations in temperature and altitudes, MAF vs SD?
Old 04-16-2019, 10:14 AM
  #7  
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
 
Last Call's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,678
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The limiting factor of the stock MAF is the hard limit of 512 grams/sec and hertz. Changing to an LS3 MAF will provide more hertz room, and you can scale around the 512 grams per second. If you don't want to do this work, an SD tune may be easier. If you tune the VE table properly, the fuel trims should take any fluctuation in airflow calculation error. Also, if you are CLSD, environmental changes like altitude should be calculated properly based on MAP reading and fuel trims.
Old 04-16-2019, 09:25 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Resolute_welding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Lindale, TX close to Tyler.
Posts: 181
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I'm with everyone else, I bet itll max the MAF before you can get what you need out of it. CLSD should drive pretty well if you take the time to get your tables right.
Old 05-02-2019, 05:15 AM
  #9  
Launching!
 
RySmDPT14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I daily drive mine in SD up to 16 lbs before last week, have since dials it back to 12. MAF was maxed at 7psi. I prefer SD, just takes time to tune correctly, but totally worth it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fullpower
FORCED INDUCTION
2
01-26-2018 11:29 PM
corvette_uae1
FORCED INDUCTION
34
09-07-2008 07:34 PM
WhySoSerious?
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
16
05-15-2008 11:38 PM
whoopassracer
FORCED INDUCTION
15
04-12-2007 10:22 PM
Ram4Pick
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
06-22-2002 04:33 PM



Quick Reply: Any advantage MAF vs 2bar SD tuning for low boost daily driver?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.