PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Vortec350ss 2005 Sierra Denali - Forged 370 and cog driven TVS2300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 02:23 PM
  #1011  
wretched73's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 450
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
Thats because the big whipples are hard to fit in a truck without major modification. I think a couple guys have used the 3.4... but i have never heard anything about it. The 4.0 just taked too much work to make it fit.

The new 4.5 on the other hand... that bad boy could work. It's made for the LS platform with a front inlet. We will see.
I thought I read on ls1tech that either the 4.0 or 4.5 they were making with a front inlet to mount on the 03-07 trucks. Maybe that was with the 4.0 and then the 4.5 they were making to fit on the camaros
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 03:19 PM
  #1012  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,282
Likes: 438
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Im not against cutting up my cowl if someone wants to buy my 2.3 whipple and fund the difference to the 4.0 whipple for me to put on a truck

Rob, be different, do the big TVS. And I find it funny you have cog belts on the 2300 and you are worried about procharger BOV noises
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 06:41 PM
  #1013  
milkey57's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 531
Likes: 4
From: Cedar Park, Tx
Default

The procharger has a better chance of delivering what I want on the top end. This would also require a cam swap, and I would be torn between a factory 87mm truck intake and a holley high ram. Odds are I would go high ram. Max boost would probably be about 20psi. My fear here is to get a converter that makes this combo sing it would have to be pretty loose... in my truck at its current weight with AWD a loose converter blows. It would also very likely be wildly inefficient up top. Hell even my PT2800 drove loose with the 1900. Looser than most of you with a 245mm 3600 with a single cab 2wd to put it in perspective. Another downside is the noise.. that BOV with a big procharger is loud as hell. Obnoxious almost for a street vehicle. Thats what this is and what it always will be. Its a street truck I take to the track from time to time just to proove its fast lol.

With either combo shift points will likely be about 6800.

Not much to say beyond that... just figured I would open it up to discussion and see what people think.[/QUOTE]

Could always use the enclosed race valve. Those are much quieter. I think it would be pretty cool to see another procharger build personally.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 06:54 PM
  #1014  
mikevanky's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

I want to see what some spray will do on this truck!

PD and spray is a match made in heaven IMO.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 06:54 PM
  #1015  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
Im not against cutting up my cowl if someone wants to buy my 2.3 whipple and fund the difference to the 4.0 whipple for me to put on a truck

Rob, be different, do the big TVS. And I find it funny you have cog belts on the 2300 and you are worried about procharger BOV noises
I know right... but a BOV with a big procharger is way louder than my cog pulley's are. It's wild. Kurts with the D2 was obnoxious on the highway. It's a level up from the cogs by a wide margin.

Originally Posted by milkey57

Could always use the enclosed race valve. Those are much quieter. I think it would be pretty cool to see another procharger build personally.
I do too. We will see. The softer bottom end of the prochargers that are capable of 1000 to the tires through my drivetrain has me a little nervous. I'll be tuning one this spring... so we'll see how it does. That will play a huge role in the decision.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 07:09 PM
  #1016  
LOWRIDERGMC's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: LAUREL
Default

Originally Posted by mikevanky
I want to see what some spray will do on this truck!

PD and spray is a match made in heaven IMO.
O yes it is.....
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 07:53 PM
  #1017  
LOWRIDERGMC's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: LAUREL
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
So in thinking through my next steps there are a few things on my mind. I want to stick to a blower. I like the instant power. Even a procharger is snappy compared to a turbo which almost gives up all 'snap' for what is almost endless roll on power.

First, obviously, its gotta be good for big power. Not like 90mm turbo power... but big power. Power that could take me mid 10's at 5300#. To that end I think I have narrowed it down to 2 options.

The TVS2650 or a procharger F1A-94.

The TVS delivers what I like in a power adder hands down. Question is can it deliver enough? The blower swap would involve another cam swap to allow the larger compressor to do its thing without choking. I would likely limit it to 18PSI or so seeing as these things don't love high boost. The cam would really let it breathe... so 18psi is a hell of a lot more air than most are flowing with a 370.

The procharger has a better chance of delivering what I want on the top end. This would also require a cam swap, and I would be torn between a factory 87mm truck intake and a holley high ram. Odds are I would go high ram. Max boost would probably be about 20psi. My fear here is to get a converter that makes this combo sing it would have to be pretty loose... in my truck at its current weight with AWD a loose converter blows. It would also very likely be wildly inefficient up top. Hell even my PT2800 drove loose with the 1900. Looser than most of you with a 245mm 3600 with a single cab 2wd to put it in perspective. Another downside is the noise.. that BOV with a big procharger is loud as hell. Obnoxious almost for a street vehicle. Thats what this is and what it always will be. Its a street truck I take to the track from time to time just to proove its fast lol.

With either combo shift points will likely be about 6800.

Not much to say beyond that... just figured I would open it up to discussion and see what people think.
I vote tvs 2650, stand alone fuel cell with a 200 shot 😈
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 08:16 PM
  #1018  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,593
Likes: 900
From: JunkYard
Default

I Vote Whipple 2.9L...
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 09:41 PM
  #1019  
GRRR65GTO's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 547
Likes: 1
From: MA
Default

After that shitshow of whipple vs tvs I hope youd still go with tvs
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 10:28 PM
  #1020  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Originally Posted by LOWRIDERGMC
I vote tvs 2650, stand alone fuel cell with a 200 shot 😈
I kinda like where your head is at.

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
I Vote Whipple 2.9L...
You would.

Originally Posted by GRRR65GTO
After that shitshow of whipple vs tvs I hope youd still go with tvs
Only way I'd go twin screw is if it was to something obnoxiously large. 4.0 or bigger. I'm not willing to cut my cowl just yet.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.