PROJECTS GALLERY Vehicle builds | Engine Swaps | Conversions | Installation write ups |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Vortec350ss 2005 Sierra Denali - Forged 370 and cog driven TVS2300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 07:32 PM
  #1001  
GM1697's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 12
From: in MA or SC
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
Wtf is that?
Something he found in a dumpster.

Buy a shirt.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 08:01 PM
  #1002  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Name:  1CE6D09E-7F49-45CB-BBD4-C073A6ECD5C2_zpsaenc3ecr.jpg
Views: 161
Size:  47.4 KB
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 10:17 PM
  #1003  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

That would be a stand alone fuel cell. It's aluminum with an in tank pump and external regulator. I'll use it to hold really high octane fuel if/when I add nitrous so I don't have to pull anymore timing than when I am boost only.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 10:21 PM
  #1004  
GRRR65GTO's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 547
Likes: 1
From: MA
Default

So that would feed the nitrous solenoid only? So in theory you wouldnt have to mess with your tune when you hit the nitrous?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 10:48 PM
  #1005  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Correct. I tune it to be a fairly aggressive tune boost only and kill mode is an "on" switch and WOT away from another 200 horsepower. C16 in the cell would get it done.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 12:45 PM
  #1006  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

So in thinking through my next steps there are a few things on my mind. I want to stick to a blower. I like the instant power. Even a procharger is snappy compared to a turbo which almost gives up all 'snap' for what is almost endless roll on power.

First, obviously, its gotta be good for big power. Not like 90mm turbo power... but big power. Power that could take me mid 10's at 5300#. To that end I think I have narrowed it down to 2 options.

The TVS2650 or a procharger F1A-94.

The TVS delivers what I like in a power adder hands down. Question is can it deliver enough? The blower swap would involve another cam swap to allow the larger compressor to do its thing without choking. I would likely limit it to 18PSI or so seeing as these things don't love high boost. The cam would really let it breathe... so 18psi is a hell of a lot more air than most are flowing with a 370.

The procharger has a better chance of delivering what I want on the top end. This would also require a cam swap, and I would be torn between a factory 87mm truck intake and a holley high ram. Odds are I would go high ram. Max boost would probably be about 20psi. My fear here is to get a converter that makes this combo sing it would have to be pretty loose... in my truck at its current weight with AWD a loose converter blows. It would also very likely be wildly inefficient up top. Hell even my PT2800 drove loose with the 1900. Looser than most of you with a 245mm 3600 with a single cab 2wd to put it in perspective. Another downside is the noise.. that BOV with a big procharger is loud as hell. Obnoxious almost for a street vehicle. Thats what this is and what it always will be. Its a street truck I take to the track from time to time just to proove its fast lol.

With either combo shift points will likely be about 6800.

Not much to say beyond that... just figured I would open it up to discussion and see what people think.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 01:00 PM
  #1007  
wretched73's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 450
Default

IMO you're dead set on a PD blower and don't want anything else by the way you wrote that last post.

Why not try one of those massive whipples? Like a 4.0 or something?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 01:08 PM
  #1008  
GM1697's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 12
From: in MA or SC
Default

Whipple?

You'll be pioneering the tvs2650 on the LS platform, that's something worthwhile imo
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 01:13 PM
  #1009  
wretched73's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 450
Default

Originally Posted by GM1697
Whipple?

You'll be pioneering the tvs2650 on the LS platform, that's something worthwhile imo
I've never seen a big whipple on any GM pickup, so if pioneering was your goal that would be another avenue to try.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 01:45 PM
  #1010  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Thats because the big whipples are hard to fit in a truck without major modification. I think a couple guys have used the 3.4... but i have never heard anything about it. The 4.0 just taked too much work to make it fit.

The new 4.5 on the other hand... that bad boy could work. It's made for the LS platform with a front inlet. We will see.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.