New Members Come in and introduce yourself.

Compression ratio question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2019, 12:56 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ewillett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Compression ratio question.

I currently have an 06 sierra with a 5.3l . I have since purchased a brian tooley racing cam package stage 3 truck cam with 218/224 110 cam and have decided to slap on sone 799 heads i had laying around. I want to restore my compression ratio due to the 64 cc heads im putting on. How much should i have them milled to achieve a 10:1 compression ratio.
Old 05-08-2019, 06:30 AM
  #2  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
trxmxzx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 874
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Milling .007” will remove 1cc

correct me me if I’m wrong but that’s what I remember
Old 05-08-2019, 01:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trxmxzx
Milling .007” will remove 1cc

correct me me if I’m wrong but that’s what I remember
Accurate.

However, I'd give the 706s a chance first.
Old 05-08-2019, 02:10 PM
  #4  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
 
trxmxzx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 874
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmann26
Accurate.

However, I'd give the 706s a chance first.

Agreed! My 862 heads milled .032” made my truck nice and crisp... there is a write up online a 5.3 vs all stock heads

Modified 5.3L Head Test: 706 vs. 799
This is the test everyone wanted to see, and the one every LS owner will be talking about. The 799 heads offered the most flow, bettering the 706 heads by as much as 20 cfm at some lift points. The chamber volume on the 799 heads was within 2.5 cc’s of the 706 heads, but the dyno indicated this did not translate into power on our test engine. The peak numbers were certainly close (473 hp vs. 471 hp), but the graph tells the story best. The 706 heads were simply better than the 799 heads through most of the curve. Would this change with the presence of boost? We think it might, but only at extreme levels that might tax the flow limit of the 706 heads.”

http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...nder-head-test

Old 05-08-2019, 02:18 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Exact reason I gambled with pulling my CNC 317s off in favor of lightly milled 706s.

On a 370 with a ls3 gasket, this equates to about 12.0:1 compression.

I had to back off WOT timing to about 22-23 degrees. I run my AFR a little fat to be safe.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rhino79
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
04-04-2011 10:52 PM
KozzyJr
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
4
12-05-2010 10:17 AM
454navyss
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
7
02-27-2010 08:53 AM
Spoolin
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
72
10-12-2009 05:00 PM
truck
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
04-21-2002 09:22 PM



Quick Reply: Compression ratio question.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.