TSP 220r 110lsa
#21
The 114 will have a tamer idle. It's still a good cam no doubt, but it's a definite step in the direction of a more mild cam. I think it's a great 5.3 cam, but what I spec'd will have a more meaty tq curve. It will have a fairly aggressive idle, maybe more than I'd want as my sole DD, but I tend to like somewhat conservative stuff. The specs I tossed out are ore aggressive so only bc the original cam would have been straight wicked sounding at idle in a 5.3.
#22
The 114 will have a tamer idle. It's still a good cam no doubt, but it's a definite step in the direction of a more mild cam. I think it's a great 5.3 cam, but what I spec'd will have a more meaty tq curve. It will have a fairly aggressive idle, maybe more than I'd want as my sole DD, but I tend to like somewhat conservative stuff. The specs I tossed out are ore aggressive so only bc the original cam would have been straight wicked sounding at idle in a 5.3.
Last edited by GM1697; Feb 12, 2015 at 07:40 AM.
#23
I know my truck is a little different due to the weight but I had a L33 with a TSP 220 112 and with stock converter it was really doggy till about 3500 and then it came on real strong, with a 3200 converter it was better but I honestly wish it had a 3600.
I had LTs and a tune
I had LTs and a tune
#24
Trick Flow 216/220 cam. Hard to beat the price. This would work with a TB converter.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/tf...2001/overview/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/tf...2001/overview/
Also what about the 269HR-12? Sorry, I know I'm all over the place guys.
Last edited by GM1697; Feb 12, 2015 at 08:08 AM.
#25
the 212/218 will have really strong low end and mid with a nice bump up top compared to stock cam. The 216/220 is going to move the 212/218 power band up and will retain low end have awesome mid range and very noticeable top end. the 220 would mainly be a top end cam which is not good for a dd IMO.
#26
the 212/218 will have really strong low end and mid with a nice bump up top compared to stock cam. The 216/220 is going to move the 212/218 power band up and will retain low end have awesome mid range and very noticeable top end. the 220 would mainly be a top end cam which is not good for a dd IMO.
Sorry for so many questions.


#27
My 210/218 on 116lsa with 4+ advance actually increased my over all mpg by 1-1.5. I think a lot of this has to do with the larger over lap allowing more cylinder pressure bleed off, high vacuum and smother running.
The 216/220 probably won't improve the mpgs, they might stay the same if you can keep your foot out of it, or they might go down slightly in the city. If they go down it shouldn't be anything drastic maybe 1 or 2 at worst. Has a lot to do with the tune and how you drive.
The 216/220 probably won't improve the mpgs, they might stay the same if you can keep your foot out of it, or they might go down slightly in the city. If they go down it shouldn't be anything drastic maybe 1 or 2 at worst. Has a lot to do with the tune and how you drive.
#28
With factory manifolds you need to increase exhaust duration and decrease the advance. It positions the overlap on the intake stroke which is hugely important with the added exhaust pressure of factory manifolds. Too much advance and you will actually disrupt the intake flow.
#29
With factory manifolds you need to increase exhaust duration and decrease the advance. It positions the overlap on the intake stroke which is hugely important with the added exhaust pressure of factory manifolds. Too much advance and you will actually disrupt the intake flow.
#30
The 216/220 probably won't improve the mpgs, they might stay the same if you can keep your foot out of it, or they might go down slightly in the city. If they go down it shouldn't be anything drastic maybe 1 or 2 at worst. Has a lot to do with the tune and how you drive.


