INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Question on Power difference between high compression and low compression N/A engines

Old Oct 9, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #61  
Spoolin's Avatar
Thread Starter
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

I think that's what it was... Now your making me second guess myself!!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 04:22 PM
  #62  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

He had a 370
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #63  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,596
Likes: 900
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
That could be very likely, considering I can't even be trusted to put a brake pad on the right way who knows what else I fucked up!!
Should I get the list out???
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #64  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Wilde racing built a 408 with 11.1:1 compression of something to that effect. Not really sure what it eventually made because he never put it on rollers but he made it live with a good tune and good fuel.
370, and i think its 10.4:1 CR.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #65  
Spoolin's Avatar
Thread Starter
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
Should I get the list out???
Ummmm, nahhhhhh. Keep that tucked in for a later day.

Originally Posted by charcold-bowtie
370, and i think its 10.4:1 CR.
Yeah I was waaaaayyyy off. It was in fact a 370 at 10.4:1.




Oh and btw, this weekend at the track the truck went 14.3 @ 103mph. Good starting point!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #66  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

what was your 60ft. Good trap speed.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #67  
LsxCody's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 1
From: Virginia!!!!
Default

370 is what I remember reading lol
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #68  
Spoolin's Avatar
Thread Starter
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by charcold-bowtie
what was your 60ft. Good trap speed.
The best 60 foot time was 2.27. It was the first run of the day as well and I left at about 1500rpm's. All the other runs of the day got progressively slower.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #69  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

as it got progressively hotter and more humid. Wish i had stuck that first run

Julien, your frog looked and sounded awesome, makes me want a rcsb
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #70  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

you trap speed may be good to around a 13 flat.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.