INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Is my cam too small for my displacement/plan?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 08:13 AM
  #1  
cpolaris502's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default Is my cam too small for my displacement/plan?

I built my engine last winter and have had it installed and running all summer. I have a 402ci, forged bottom end with 9.1:1 compression for turbo. I wasn't super impressed with this engine after going from a stock 4.8, but I also know with the compression it probably isn't optimized for NA operation.

Current cam specs are 224/228/112, .535 lift. Should I look at swapping it with something else while I work on the truck and turbo over the winter? Is the LSA too tight on this one?

Everything else about the motor is stock, 317 heads, intake, etc.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 09:36 AM
  #2  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

The cam isnt all that aggressive, but for a turbo its not bad. Turbo's arent nearly as picky as NA or superchargers are. You could gain more power with a different cam, but or the most part people just crank up the boost and let the turbo do all the work.

As far as the engine feeling sluggish... 9.0 compression will do that to you.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 07:31 PM
  #3  
Blackpanther99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,958
Likes: 0
From: Baytown, TX
Default

Nah, its not too bad bud. Could be bigger tough.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 08:16 PM
  #4  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

What heads are on it?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 08:27 PM
  #5  
Budakane's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Default

I was about to ask the same thing...lol
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #6  
Noah Burns's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

if'n it's a stock headed 402 then that'll explain a lot, but either way that's a tiny cam for a 400" engine.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 08:59 PM
  #7  
1Bear's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 8
From: Jones Creek, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by cpolaris502
Everything else about the motor is stock, 317 heads, intake, etc.
From his original post he stated everything else is stock, so it looks like unworked 317 heads.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 09:54 PM
  #8  
Noah Burns's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

it needs more cam for sure.. even when you turbo it I'd want more cam in it
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
oakley6575's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I would run it. I wouldn't run anything bigger than a low 230's duration cam for a 1000+ rwhp 400ci turbo set up, but that is just me. While it could be changed and spec'd a bit different, I don't think it would be worth the change/time/money. That should be a good cam for your set up and give decent low/midrange tq.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2013 | 11:45 PM
  #10  
gamble686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Default

I think a TU1.5 speed inc cam would go really well. I think they are on sale too.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.