INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Ls 327

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2009 | 01:35 AM
  #41  
viciousknid's Avatar
Where's the Beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 1
From: Dover, Oklahoma
Default

It would be fun to destroke and have a high reving engine for the track in a car I can't see it working well in a truck that needs low end torque to keep moving.
However this does bring up an interesting question. What ever happend to the 01 302ci z28 project that GM got with Westech Automotive to build?
I had heard of great power out put at 6k rpm but have heard NOTHING beyond that. Did it just fall through or what?
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 02:48 AM
  #42  
PathfinderJr's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 721
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by viciousknid
It would be fun to destroke and have a high reving engine for the track in a car I can't see it working well in a truck that needs low end torque to keep moving.
True. I guess that whole point makes it more a less an exercise in engineering, but an interesting one at that.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #43  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default

I heard the westech project was shown for a couple of years the scrapped.

Another guy in a Hot-Rod article built his own and put it into a 68 Camaro using stock LT-1 block and heads with the 267ci LT-1 varient 3" stroke to finish the combo. It got out 420 HP, and probily would of been very streetable for such a ci vs hp deal. My friend got a LT-4 and we swapped the cam plus a couple other things out for a bit over 500 horse. While pretty mean to drive it was no where near as wrong as my comperabley horsed 357sbc.

I wonder if the reason they scrapped the idea was that 302 or 5.0 was so associated with Ford they figured it wouldn't fly. Also they SCCA rules that mandated the 305ci rule in the 60's were scrapped in the very early 70's, and race motors had since evolved to have little in common with any street motor except the name.

I think the heritage 2010 Camaro should have a 302 or 327 inch motor. Although I would get the V6 becouse my house is pretty effcient at parting me from my money.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 09:53 PM
  #44  
jkwalkercchs's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: morristown/newport,tn
Default

Originally Posted by L7 Sierra
I heard the westech project was shown for a couple of years the scrapped.

Another guy in a Hot-Rod article built his own and put it into a 68 Camaro using stock LT-1 block and heads with the 267ci LT-1 varient 3" stroke to finish the combo. It got out 420 HP, and probily would of been very streetable for such a ci vs hp deal. My friend got a LT-4 and we swapped the cam plus a couple other things out for a bit over 500 horse. While pretty mean to drive it was no where near as wrong as my comperabley horsed 357sbc.

I wonder if the reason they scrapped the idea was that 302 or 5.0 was so associated with Ford they figured it wouldn't fly. Also they SCCA rules that mandated the 305ci rule in the 60's were scrapped in the very early 70's, and race motors had since evolved to have little in common with any street motor except the name.

I think the heritage 2010 Camaro should have a 302 or 327 inch motor. Although I would get the V6 becouse my house is pretty effcient at parting me from my money.
daytona prototypes use 5.0 ls style engines lol

i had a crank rods and pistons from one some may remember
sold them to a guy in new zealand who was wanting it for some kind of supercar that went crazy fast
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #45  
acethedragon's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

i love projects that are different and this is one. i say do and to hell with everyone. are you doing it for you or for everyone else? its really simple. use the 4.8 crank and rods with lq9 pistons. gm made up the difference in crank with the rods. where its gonna get expensive is with balancing that short stroke crank for the heavy pistons. try to find some real light aftermarket forgings then turbo the mother. have fun with it regardless.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
11Denali62
Racing and Kills Forum
13
Nov 29, 2013 06:59 PM
HAMMER!
MULTIMEDIA (truck related)
20
May 12, 2012 10:33 PM
sickREDsierra
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
21
Jan 3, 2009 01:00 PM
00ChevyScott
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
31
Aug 14, 2008 10:51 AM
99FireTA
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
28
Aug 27, 2003 08:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.