INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Ls 327

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:12 PM
  #1  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default Ls 327

Has anyone ever tried to fit or thought about fitting a 4.8 crank into a 6.0 block to build a 327?

I just love the sound of 327. The bore stroke ratio is really very good for power and effiency. Plus you could get a little more RPM out of a stock crank due to piston speed.

I know bigger engines produce more torque at any given rpm which is easier on the motor, but I am just wondering if this could be done with out special pistions. Maybe I could use stock 6.0 pistons and shorter rods to compensate for pin height.
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

where have you heard a gen III/gen IV 327?
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

It will not sound like a old school chevy.. Different firing order.. small block gen1 1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2.. Lsx order 1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3..
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:33 PM
  #4  
Phantom's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 50
From: The 405
Default

it would require custom pistons and rods
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:38 PM
  #5  
PathfinderJr's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 721
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

in theory you could use the stock 4.8 rods and then need custom pistons, but to build it to rev high and be durable, yeah off the shelf pistons and rods ain't gonna do it.
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #6  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default

Random hero. I have never heard one or read about anybody doing this idea, but a 4.8 crank is barely a touch longer then the 3.25" a traditional 327 has. Combine that with a 6.0 block, and if pistons are cheaply enough available you in therory have a 329. Although I prefer 327.
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #7  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default

Mangled GMC.

I have heard 6.0's in muscle cars with out all the BS they have, and a carb. I after listening to it for quite awhile could not tell it was not a healthy 350. You'll have by far a greater exhaust tone from mufllers then a 4-7 and 2-3 firing order swap.

Loud exhaust makes everything sound bad. Including a guy at works 4.3.
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:53 PM
  #8  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

So your only reason for doing this is sound? I really don't understand that, sorry.
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
A Low Dime's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
From: Arlington (DFW), Texas
Default

So, you want to spend a bunch of money trying to get a 327? You theory two posts up says you will get a 329, which is two CI's larger than 327, when you could just use a 5.3, which is two less? WTF
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #10  
RandomHero's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 1
From: Austin,TX Name:Mark
Default

Originally Posted by A Low Dime
So, you want to spend a bunch of money trying to get a 327? You theory two posts up says you will get a 329, which is two CI's larger than 327, when you could just use a 5.3, which is two less? WTF
A 5.3 is a 325 cubic inch engine.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.