INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Haven't seen these cam specs. What do you think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #1  
2000SSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default Haven't seen these cam specs. What do you think?

Thinking of going a little bigger on my cam with my mods listed in my sig. No other changes. It runs really well right now, definitley don't want a loss of performance. Cam specs 222/228, 567/567, 113lsa. What do think I should expect? Current setup got 353RWHP on HPE's dyno and I drive it daily.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #2  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

any reason for the exhaust bias'd split
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #3  
2000SSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Just a shelf cam with those specs. Not looking at nitrous or a blower anytime soon.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #4  
99Silverado5.3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
From: (281)-(713)-(832)
Default

I would leave that 220 in there, 353rwhp is stout.

You would at best gain a few hp/tq, like maybe 5 in the lower rpm. Definitely not worth it IMO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Choda
MULTIMEDIA (truck related)
12
Jan 22, 2026 02:03 PM
XL7
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
8
May 5, 2022 01:48 PM
kr1s
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
9
Aug 24, 2015 05:34 PM
custm2500
WEAPONS
5
Aug 17, 2015 05:48 PM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Jul 26, 2015 10:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.